public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Richard Purdie" <rpurdie@rpsys.net>
To: "Rusty Russell" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>, <adaplas@pol.net>,
	"lkml - Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kill symbol_get & friends
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 20:46:07 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <037701c4fc0c$87abd910$0f01a8c0@max> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1105685810.7311.96.camel@localhost.localdomain

Rusty Russell:
> If it really wants dynamic symbol lookup, that's damn well what's going
> to happen.  intermodule must die.  If David doesn't want that feature
> any more, then sure, remove it.

I can see one scenario where symbol_get would appear to be useful. Say you 
have two modules A and B. Both can run independently of the other. If and 
only if both are loaded at the same time they need to exchange data.

Without symbol_get, you can only have hard dependencies between the modules 
and hence you would be forced into loading both modules even if you only 
want one of them.

I came across this function when trying to solve this exact problem. If the 
function is going to be removed, what is the alternative? Apologies if I've 
missed something obvious...

Richard 


  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-16 20:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-12 20:31 [PATCH] kill symbol_get & friends Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-13  0:19 ` Rusty Russell
2005-01-13  0:59   ` Dave Airlie
2005-01-13  2:25     ` Rusty Russell
2005-01-13  8:42     ` David Woodhouse
2005-01-13  4:18   ` Dave Jones
2005-01-13  8:45   ` David Woodhouse
2005-01-13 17:05   ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-14  6:56     ` Rusty Russell
2005-01-16 20:46       ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2005-01-17  2:47         ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='037701c4fc0c$87abd910$0f01a8c0@max' \
    --to=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
    --cc=adaplas@pol.net \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox