From: Jesse Pollard <jesse@cats-chateau.net>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Timothy Miller <miller@techsource.com>
Cc: Grigor Gatchev <grigor@zadnik.org>,
Christer Weinigel <christer@weinigel.se>,
Nikita Danilov <Nikita@Namesys.COM>, <root@chaos.analogic.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: A Layered Kernel: Proposal
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 09:43:21 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <04022609432200.08433@tabby> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402251955040.8976-100000@chimarrao.boston.redhat.com>
On Wednesday 25 February 2004 18:55, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Timothy Miller wrote:
> > I think TOE (TCP/IP stack on the ethernet card) might be one of those
> > things which doesn't fit cleanly into the layered model.
>
> That's not a big problem though, as long as the Linux network
> stack keeps outperforming TOE adapters ;)
Until you add IPSEC...
Unless the TOE has the same security support (encrypt some packets, not
others, require verification from some networks, not others,...), and
flexibility that the Linux network stack has, and ...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-26 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-24 20:05 A Layered Kernel: Proposal Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-24 22:31 ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-25 9:08 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-25 12:52 ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-25 13:23 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-25 15:08 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-25 15:42 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-25 16:01 ` Nikita Danilov
2004-02-25 19:25 ` Christer Weinigel
2004-02-25 19:46 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-25 23:40 ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-26 0:55 ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-26 15:43 ` Jesse Pollard [this message]
2004-02-26 17:12 ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-27 9:45 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-26 11:03 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-26 5:59 ` jw schultz
2004-02-29 12:32 ` Christer Weinigel
2004-02-29 14:48 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-03-01 6:07 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-03-06 18:51 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-03-08 3:11 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-03-08 12:23 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-03-08 17:39 ` Theodore Ts'o
2004-03-08 20:41 ` viro
2004-03-09 19:12 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-03-09 21:03 ` Timothy Miller
2004-03-09 23:24 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-03-08 18:41 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-03-08 21:33 ` Paul Jackson
2004-02-25 14:44 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-24 22:54 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-25 10:03 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-25 19:58 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-25 21:59 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-25 22:22 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-26 11:46 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-26 12:17 ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-26 16:37 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-26 18:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-26 19:23 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-27 11:18 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-27 18:05 ` Tim Hockin
2004-02-27 18:34 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-27 18:27 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-28 0:26 ` Rik van Riel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-24 20:28 Carlos Silva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=04022609432200.08433@tabby \
--to=jesse@cats-chateau.net \
--cc=Nikita@Namesys.COM \
--cc=christer@weinigel.se \
--cc=grigor@zadnik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miller@techsource.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=root@chaos.analogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox