From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.manjaro.org (mail.manjaro.org [116.203.91.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1BBA1F76A8 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 20:30:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.91.91 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741120227; cv=none; b=DsnuR+7rKWE09YnSI8xcRkbL0w/7QJVHhe32krQaXpe0z536yC5Fd6djL1rOe3HLloD6ey99YbFSrqgoTURHtwWKe/mupN/lGP0nKnompJ9U0wPNlMP/Fxfus0Egtqhnth9i8UGTrM3ocMMJ2eBvOY9w92QX9743PveRi6O9UQE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741120227; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Z7qAp8BgePLwDRIQEm4ooNb8/sKXNc9d4KVJ+VMNhBA=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Content-Type; b=Z3MSJKQCGFuVA4BEhff62TNf5Vy0reFZSfqjWIa5lWPBANyi313ME+AwCqfWkixRKng0ny68n9+Wq+Ek1A1Eq67peXvkunIk4RADcC9Z3r63cf6otl4E3hlz0vCY6bLjCTOdyLbQ+CBdUV/R5qxB6Kl60OYcgHBUtmD7Oo5KB70= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=manjaro.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manjaro.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=manjaro.org header.i=@manjaro.org header.b=jNP4ReSa; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.91.91 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=manjaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manjaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=manjaro.org header.i=@manjaro.org header.b="jNP4ReSa" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=manjaro.org; s=2021; t=1741120223; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=a6WzCje76QLUKJGbmYoeUe7d9zKFda9oGc8+kEK4a04=; b=jNP4ReSawiAxad9womJccr4tfSjzlhZUJA6DV3kWGJXSysytY4Z8oqIOu2KElbzgCtxThe Hb6obA+e0Qo/eYo2+zpV+mtx40sUxmEqUnAw4mQxJbez7q10pXKoybJIO9Uu2fYNmla3cE PDPzlUbH2X+2eWAHvki/b8nLITpLoAopv5K8ASny7u2n7w253EIR3hZZPTyz/t/zEY2hvK 1h4mrF8gHB7qXOgkGIyyPIFUWoBghSgDu13Y9Jz18RqL63V6sJvR3FyqOKdUZrOXV6xRnT RG5VgCo8Voq1kDCl3iZs+gL4BxgzMADdzke5argxV/fGYQPeGQ58inZobpDDaQ== Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 21:30:22 +0100 From: Dragan Simic To: Heiko Stuebner Cc: andy.yan@rock-chips.com, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org, tzimmermann@suse.de, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, quentin.schulz@cherry.de, Heiko Stuebner Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/rockchip: lvds: move pclk preparation in with clk_get In-Reply-To: <20250304124418.111061-2-heiko@sntech.de> References: <20250304124418.111061-1-heiko@sntech.de> <20250304124418.111061-2-heiko@sntech.de> Message-ID: <041c5f0e2371817a27577bd0989b9dca@manjaro.org> X-Sender: dsimic@manjaro.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Authentication-Results: ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=dsimic@manjaro.org smtp.mailfrom=dsimic@manjaro.org Hello Heiko, On 2025-03-04 13:44, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c > index 385cf6881504..ecfae8d5da89 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c > @@ -448,15 +448,13 @@ struct drm_encoder_helper_funcs > px30_lvds_encoder_helper_funcs = { > static int rk3288_lvds_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, > struct rockchip_lvds *lvds) > { > - int ret; > - > lvds->regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0); > if (IS_ERR(lvds->regs)) > return PTR_ERR(lvds->regs); > > - lvds->pclk = devm_clk_get(lvds->dev, "pclk_lvds"); > + lvds->pclk = devm_clk_get_prepared(lvds->dev, "pclk_lvds"); > if (IS_ERR(lvds->pclk)) { > - DRM_DEV_ERROR(lvds->dev, "could not get pclk_lvds\n"); > + DRM_DEV_ERROR(lvds->dev, "could not get or prepare pclk_lvds\n"); I'm wondering why this patch isn't replacing deprecated DRM logging macros with their preferred successors in a couple of places, just like what the patch 2/3 from this series does?