From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC961C10DC3 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2023 16:44:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230438AbjLDQoF (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2023 11:44:05 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52442 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229477AbjLDQoE (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2023 11:44:04 -0500 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CB3AAC; Mon, 4 Dec 2023 08:44:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1701708250; x=1733244250; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8gQdgndpZFQZb2gJqlOJ/xwgQA+emZiGmAjbrIpj5Xs=; b=J9Bep8zsjFMdehpyfTpx1Jy9YHC+B8Th5yFVqqxod2mm+1RSIgHVRQEG +nOxHCdb7GWvDMlqTLBO9+GlYdaWm1R6fNU9PWz3xnpYiifnTjZJ9Mr9S i5Ul7NCM8Hde7Tc6ecCcCzW/CqDVqSNDF8QymqGwOWcGq8i/RcqLBbZua eUmck8VKivrRNsckGujhOBqaulPml5Ns6cwew6zSAZ1uK+5886QMAx5Cj W9P71dqyeNIhYiJrzc1RvMNoVSbsuR5B11JNCil/dQmbNZ5Zrbx9ntSrR QSSgs2zS3UYys3tqAeC8501eCAtWqe1RQQVT+Fsy3aBtuGswz74LGdZuk g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10914"; a="12476131" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,250,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="12476131" Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Dec 2023 08:44:10 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10914"; a="836641461" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,250,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="836641461" Received: from sdneilso-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.212.147.197]) ([10.212.147.197]) by fmsmga008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Dec 2023 08:44:09 -0800 Message-ID: <041f60ab-a90a-4654-afd2-c2a296a25c46@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 10:44:08 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ASoC: Intel: soc-acpi-intel-tgl-match: add cs42l43 and cs35l56 support Content-Language: en-US To: Richard Fitzgerald , broonie@kernel.org, peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com, yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com Cc: kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com, cezary.rojewski@intel.com, ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@opensource.cirrus.com References: <20231204135614.2169624-1-rf@opensource.cirrus.com> <8510b464-9352-480d-88cf-857597e16cbc@linux.intel.com> From: Pierre-Louis Bossart In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Don't we need the same change of name_prefix for >> soc-acpi-intel-mtl-match.c? I see this in the existing code: >> > > The chain that Peter sent only has CS35L56 added to tgl-match. > > I've checked the history of mtl-match and the patch that added CS35L56 > there was not cc'd to any cirrus.com email address so we didn't notice > it. Otherwise we would have picked this up earlier. alsa-devel is noisy. > > I haven't got a MTL platform to test on but I can send a separate patch > to change mtl-match if you are happy with this prefix change. That would be nice, best to align on all platforms and use the same the same prefix.