From: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/vt-d: Remove caching mode check before devtlb flush
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 16:36:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <04b9c7cb-e2ac-4dcf-8594-da101a98bc49@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240407144232.190355-2-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
On 2024/4/7 22:42, Lu Baolu wrote:
> The Caching Mode (CM) of the Intel IOMMU indicates if the hardware
> implementation caches not-present or erroneous translation-structure
> entries except the first-stage translation. The caching mode is
> unrelated to the device TLB , therefore there is no need to check
> it before a device TLB invalidation operation.
>
> Before the scalable mode is introduced, caching mode is treated as
> an indication that the driver is running in a VM guest. This is just
> a software contract as shadow page table is the only way to implement
> a virtual IOMMU. But the VT-d spec doesn't state this anywhere. After
> the scalable mode is introduced, this doesn't stand for anymore, as
> caching mode is not relevant for the first-stage translation. A virtual
> IOMMU implementation is free to support first-stage translation only
> with caching mode cleared.
>
> Remove the caching mode check before device TLB invalidation to ensure
> compatibility with the scalable mode use cases.
>
> Fixes: 792fb43ce2c9 ("iommu/vt-d: Enable Intel IOMMU scalable mode by default")
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> index 493b6a600394..681789b1258d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> @@ -1501,7 +1501,7 @@ static void iommu_flush_iotlb_psi(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
> else
> __iommu_flush_iotlb_psi(iommu, did, pfn, pages, ih);
>
> - if (!cap_caching_mode(iommu->cap) && !map)
> + if (!map)
> iommu_flush_dev_iotlb(domain, addr, mask);
> }
>
IMHO. this change can be merged with patch 01. And the reason is to make
the logic simple and clear.
> @@ -1575,8 +1575,7 @@ static void intel_flush_iotlb_all(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> iommu->flush.flush_iotlb(iommu, did, 0, 0,
> DMA_TLB_DSI_FLUSH);
>
> - if (!cap_caching_mode(iommu->cap))
> - iommu_flush_dev_iotlb(dmar_domain, 0, MAX_AGAW_PFN_WIDTH);
> + iommu_flush_dev_iotlb(dmar_domain, 0, MAX_AGAW_PFN_WIDTH);
> }
>
> if (dmar_domain->nested_parent)
you can also move the iommu_flush_dev_iotlb() call out of the iommu_array
loop since it does not require checking iommu cap.
--
Regards,
Yi Liu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-09 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-07 14:42 [PATCH 1/2] iommu/vt-d: Avoid unnecessary device TLB flush in map path Lu Baolu
2024-04-07 14:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] iommu/vt-d: Remove caching mode check before devtlb flush Lu Baolu
2024-04-08 7:21 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-04-08 7:23 ` Baolu Lu
2024-04-08 7:43 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-04-08 21:03 ` Jacob Pan
2024-04-09 3:12 ` Baolu Lu
2024-04-09 17:31 ` Jacob Pan
2024-04-10 0:32 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-04-10 16:19 ` Jacob Pan
2024-04-10 23:23 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-04-11 16:17 ` Jacob Pan
2024-04-12 3:13 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-04-09 7:30 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-04-10 5:40 ` Baolu Lu
2024-04-10 23:49 ` Zhang, Tina
2024-04-11 12:15 ` Baolu Lu
2024-04-09 8:36 ` Yi Liu [this message]
2024-04-09 7:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] iommu/vt-d: Avoid unnecessary device TLB flush in map path Tian, Kevin
2024-04-09 7:21 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-04-09 8:27 ` Yi Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=04b9c7cb-e2ac-4dcf-8594-da101a98bc49@intel.com \
--to=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox