public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "roland" <devzero@web.de>
To: "Kevin Corry" <kevcorry@us.ibm.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Jeff Dike" <jdike@addtoit.com>, <agk@redhat.com>,
	<jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
Subject: Re: is there a COW inside the kernel ?
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 22:29:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <04cd01c63f09$a007a930$0200000a@aldipc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200603030828.59567.kevcorry@us.ibm.com

hello !

thanks to all for providing that information.

i think i will take a closer look on device-mapper, but i'm unsure if it`s 
perfectly suited.

can i only use devices, not files for the cow?
what about merging a cow-dev/file back to the r/o-dev/file ?
cowloop can do this, and because it can use files, i don`t need to provide a 
fixed amount of diskspace for the cow.  you have direct feedback about how 
big you cow grows....
i'm unsure about dm, but i will dig into the details. (wanted to learn more 
about dm anyway)

any chance of cowloop being merged into mainline ?
loop.c is 1343 lines of code, cowloop.c is around 1000 lines more so it`s 
"reasonable" small....and it has a _really_ nice user manual.

regards
roland

ps:
btw - mountlo looks really "freaky" - i like uml very much, but i think i 
need each bit of performance.
will take a look at mountlo just for personal interest, though.




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kevin Corry" <kevcorry@us.ibm.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "roland" <devzero@web.de>
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: is there a COW inside the kernel ?


> On Fri March 3 2006 2:29 am, roland wrote:
>> hello !
>>
>> is there an equivalent of something like
>>
>> cowloop ( http://www.atconsultancy.nl/cowloop/total.html ) or md based 
>> cow
>> device ( http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/br260/doc/report.pdf ),
>>
>> i.e. a feature called "Copy On Write Blockdevice" inside the current or 
>> the
>> near-future mainline kernel (besides UserModeLinux Arch)?
>
> Device-Mapper has a snapshot module, which is used by LVM and EVMS. You 
> can
> also use dmsetup if you want lower-level access than provided by the 
> volume
> managers. To do the equivalent of the cowloop driver that you linked to
> above, you could do something like this:
>
> Say you have a read-only block-device (say a cd-rom) at /dev/hdc. And you 
> have
> a small disk partition, /dev/hdb1, that you want to use for your "COW 
> file".
> Run:
>
> cow_size=`blockdev --getsize /dev/hdc`
> chunk_size=64   # Size of each copied-on-write chunk, in 512 byte sectors
> cow_name="my_cow_dev"
> echo "0 $cow_size snapshot /dev/hdc /dev/hdb1 p $chunk_size" | \
>   dmsetup create $cow_name
>
> This will give you a device called /dev/mapper/$cow_name. Presuming 
> /dev/hdc
> has a filesystem on it, you can mount /dev/mapper/$cow_name and get a
> read-write version of the filesystem on /dev/hdc, where updates to the
> filesystem will be stored on /dev/hdb1. The size of /dev/hdb1 can be
> significantly smaller than /dev/hdc, depending on the amount of writes you
> expect to happen on /dev/mapper/$cow_name. While this device is active, 
> don't
> try to mount /dev/hdc read-write (assuming that's possible), or it will
> corrupt the view of /dev/mapper/$cow_name. If you need read-write access 
> to
> both devices simultaneously, you'll probably just want to use LVM or EVMS 
> and
> create snapshot volumes, since manually activating that kind of setup with
> dmsetup is incredibly tricky.
>
> Use "dmsetup remove $cow_name" to deactivate the device.
>
>> i would find this useful for several purpose, but i don`t want to patch 
>> my
>> system with 3rd party drivers or "non-standard" stuff -  or even 
>> recompile
>> the kernel.
>
> This should work with any recent 2.6 kernel. You'll also need to have the
> device-mapper package installed, which should be available with any recent
> Linux distro.
>
> -- 
> Kevin Corry
> kevcorry@us.ibm.com
> http://www.ibm.com/linux/
> http://evms.sourceforge.net/ 


  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-03 21:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-03  8:29 is there a COW inside the kernel ? roland
2006-03-03 13:33 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-03-03 14:19 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2006-03-03 14:28 ` Kevin Corry
2006-03-03 21:29   ` roland [this message]
2006-03-03 22:39     ` Kevin Corry
2006-03-04  5:35     ` Jon Masters
2006-03-03 15:25 ` Jeff Dike

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='04cd01c63f09$a007a930$0200000a@aldipc' \
    --to=devzero@web.de \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
    --cc=kevcorry@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox