Re: [PATCH v4 14/15] cxl/pci: Add support to assign and clear pci_driver::cxl_err_handlers

[Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>]

On 12/12/2024 7:40 AM, Terry Bowman wrote:
> pci_driver::cxl_err_handlers are not currently assigned handler callbacks.
> The handlers can't be set in the pci_driver static definition because the
> CXL PCIe Port devices are bound to the portdrv driver which is not CXL
> driver aware.
>
> Add cxl_assign_port_error_handlers() in the cxl_core module. This
> function will assign the default handlers for a CXL PCIe Port device.
>
> When the CXL Port (cxl_port or cxl_dport) is destroyed the device's
> pci_driver::cxl_err_handlers must be set to NULL indicating they should no
> longer be used.
>
> Create cxl_clear_port_error_handlers() and register it to be called
> when the CXL Port device (cxl_port or cxl_dport) is destroyed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cxl/core/pci.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> index 3294ad5ff28f..9734a4c55b29 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> @@ -841,8 +841,38 @@ static bool cxl_port_error_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	return __cxl_handle_ras(&pdev->dev, ras_base);
>  }
>  
> +static const struct cxl_error_handlers cxl_port_error_handlers = {
> +	.error_detected	= cxl_port_error_detected,
> +	.cor_error_detected = cxl_port_cor_error_detected,
> +};
> +
> +static void cxl_assign_port_error_handlers(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct pci_driver *pdrv;
> +
> +	if (!pdev || !pdev->driver)
> +		return;
> +
> +	pdrv = pdev->driver;
> +	pdrv->cxl_err_handler = &cxl_port_error_handlers;
> +}
> +
> +static void cxl_clear_port_error_handlers(void *data)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = data;
> +	struct pci_driver *pdrv;
> +
> +	if (!pdev || !pdev->driver)
> +		return;
> +
> +	pdrv = pdev->driver;
> +	pdrv->cxl_err_handler = NULL;
> +}
> +
>  void cxl_uport_init_ras_reporting(struct cxl_port *port)
>  {
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(port->uport_dev);
> +
>  	/* uport may have more than 1 downstream EP. Check if already mapped. */
>  	if (port->uport_regs.ras)
>  		return;
> @@ -853,6 +883,9 @@ void cxl_uport_init_ras_reporting(struct cxl_port *port)
>  		dev_err(&port->dev, "Failed to map RAS capability.\n");
>  		return;
>  	}
> +
> +	cxl_assign_port_error_handlers(pdev);
> +	devm_add_action_or_reset(port->uport_dev, cxl_clear_port_error_handlers, pdev);

I think the first parameter of devm_add_action_or_reset() should be 'port->dev' rather than 'port->uport_dev'.

'port->uport_dev' is 'pci_dev->dev' which will be destroyed on pci side, 'port->dev' will be destroyed on cxl side.

>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_uport_init_ras_reporting, CXL);
>  
> @@ -864,6 +897,7 @@ void cxl_dport_init_ras_reporting(struct cxl_dport *dport)
>  {
>  	struct device *dport_dev = dport->dport_dev;
>  	struct pci_host_bridge *host_bridge = to_pci_host_bridge(dport_dev);
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dport_dev);
>  
>  	dport->reg_map.host = dport_dev;
>  	if (dport->rch && host_bridge->native_aer) {
> @@ -880,6 +914,12 @@ void cxl_dport_init_ras_reporting(struct cxl_dport *dport)
>  		dev_err(dport_dev, "Failed to map RAS capability.\n");
>  		return;
>  	}
> +
> +	if (dport->rch)
> +		return;
> +
> +	cxl_assign_port_error_handlers(pdev);
> +	devm_add_action_or_reset(dport_dev, cxl_clear_port_error_handlers, pdev);

Same as above, should use 'port->dev'.

please correct me if I am wrong.


Ming

>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_dport_init_ras_reporting, CXL);
>