From: YoshiyaETO <eto@soft.fujitsu.com>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Cc: Stuart Longland <stuartl@longlandclan.hopto.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>,
lgb@lgb.hu, Fabian.Frederick@prov-liege.be
Subject: Re: 2.7 thoughts
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 17:47:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <04d501c38f0b$2864c210$6a647c0a@eto> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20031010074030.GB700@holomorphy.com
> I don't see any reason to connect it with the notion of a node.
If the word "Node" is not so appropriate, I will use "Unit".
And I also make it simple, "Unit" will have CPUs and/or Memory.
On the other hand IO-Unit will have IOs.
> The main points of contention would appear to be cooperative vs.
> forcible (where I believe cooperative is acknowledged as the only
I could not understand what is forcible.
Everything should be cooperative, I think.
----- Original Message -----
From: "William Lee Irwin III" <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: "YoshiyaETO" <eto@soft.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Stuart Longland" <stuartl@longlandclan.hopto.org>;
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; "Stephan von Krawczynski"
<skraw@ithnet.com>; <lgb@lgb.hu>; <Fabian.Frederick@prov-liege.be>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: 2.7 thoughts
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 04:19:46PM +1000, Stuart Longland wrote:
> >>> * hotplug motherboard & entire computer too I spose ;-)
>
> > From: "William Lee Irwin III" <wli@holomorphy.com>
> >> Um, this is worse than the above wrt. being too vague.
>
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 04:30:27PM +0900, YoshiyaETO wrote:
> > "Hotplug node" is a better explanation, I think.
> > "Node" includes CPUs and/or Memory and/or some kind of IOs.
> > And "Node" should be flexibly configurable also.
>
> I don't see any reason to connect it with the notion of a node.
>
> The main points of contention would appear to be cooperative vs.
> forcible (where I believe cooperative is acknowledged as the only
> feasible problem), and the potential connections with ZONE_HIGHMEM
> wrt. constraints that would artificially introduce to 64-bit kernels.
>
> The fact some systems would want to do whole nodes at a time with
> some cpus and io buses in tandem is largely immaterial and doesn't
> simplify, complicate, or otherwise affect the VM mechanics.
>
> -- wli
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-10 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-09 8:08 2.7 thoughts Frederick, Fabian
2003-10-09 8:55 ` John Bradford
2003-10-09 9:45 ` mario noioso
2003-10-09 11:58 ` Gábor Lénárt
2003-10-09 14:57 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-10-10 6:19 ` Stuart Longland
2003-10-10 6:30 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-10 7:30 ` YoshiyaETO
2003-10-10 7:40 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-10 8:47 ` YoshiyaETO [this message]
2003-10-10 9:09 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-10 10:26 ` YoshiyaETO
2003-10-10 10:50 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-10 10:55 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-10 10:51 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-10-10 14:07 ` Stuart Longland
2003-10-10 14:27 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-10-10 14:35 ` Gábor Lénárt
2003-10-10 14:47 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-10 14:48 ` Mark Mielke
2003-10-10 15:01 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-10 15:50 ` Mark Mielke
2003-10-10 16:35 ` Chris Friesen
2003-10-10 16:44 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-12 20:14 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-10 15:12 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-10-10 15:21 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-10 18:03 ` Tim Hockin
2003-10-10 18:29 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-10 18:56 ` Tim Hockin
2003-10-10 23:40 ` Rusty Russell
2003-10-15 19:15 ` Anton Blanchard
2003-10-10 13:30 ` Kevin Corry
2003-10-10 18:29 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2003-10-11 3:49 ` jw schultz
2003-10-11 13:24 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2003-10-11 19:50 ` jw schultz
2003-10-10 17:12 ` Matt Simonsen
2003-10-10 20:59 ` Pedro Larroy
2003-10-09 18:17 ` Greg KH
2003-10-09 19:07 ` Pavel Machek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-09 11:56 Svetoslav Slavtchev
2003-10-09 12:44 Xose Vazquez Perez
2003-10-09 13:17 Frederick, Fabian
2003-10-09 13:19 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-09 13:50 ` Gábor Lénárt
2003-10-09 13:52 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-10-10 19:01 Zwane Mwaikambo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='04d501c38f0b$2864c210$6a647c0a@eto' \
--to=eto@soft.fujitsu.com \
--cc=Fabian.Frederick@prov-liege.be \
--cc=lgb@lgb.hu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skraw@ithnet.com \
--cc=stuartl@longlandclan.hopto.org \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox