From: barnabas.czeman@mainlining.org
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>, Todor Tomov <todor.too@gmail.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@protonmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] media: qcom: camss: fix VFE pm domain off
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 23:45:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <05e91ae70902f0cd9c47bb4197d8fef1@mainlining.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f4e47953-5a68-4ec5-860b-820b8eff2a2a@linaro.org>
On 2024-11-29 23:08, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 29/11/2024 13:46, barnabas.czeman@mainlining.org wrote:
>> On 2024-11-29 13:25, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>>> On 29/11/2024 11:44, barnabas.czeman@mainlining.org wrote:
>>>>> The change does not describe how to reproduce the problem, which
>>>>> commit
>>>>> base is tested, which platform is testes, there is no enough
>>>>> information,
>>>>> unfortunately.
>>>> I can reproduce the problem with megapixels-sensorprofile on msm8953
>>>> and
>>>> it can be reproduced with megapixels on msm8996.
>>>> The base is the last commit on next.
>>>
>>> Can you verify if vfe_domain_on has run and if so whether or not
>>> genpd_link is NULL when that function exists.
>>>
>> I have added some debug logs it seems pm_domain_on and pm_domain_off
>> is called twice on the same object.
>> [ 63.473360] qcom-camss 1b00020.camss: pm_domain_on 19842ce8 link
>> 42973800
>> [ 63.481524] qcom-camss 1b00020.camss: pm_domain_on 19840080 link
>> 4e413800
>> [ 63.481555] qcom-camss 1b00020.camss: pm_domain_on 19842ce8 link
>> 42973800
>> [ 63.481632] qcom-camss 1b00020.camss: pm_domain_off 19840080 link
>> 4e413800
>> [ 63.481641] qcom-camss 1b00020.camss: pm_domain_off 19842ce8 link
>> 42973800
>> [ 63.654004] qcom-camss 1b00020.camss: pm_domain_off 19842ce8 link 0
>>> That's the question.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> bod
>
> Could you provide this output ?
>
> index 80a62ba112950..b25b8f6b00be1 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
> @@ -595,6 +595,9 @@ void vfe_isr_reset_ack(struct vfe_device *vfe)
> */
> void vfe_pm_domain_off(struct vfe_device *vfe)
> {
> +dev_info(camss->dev, "%s VFE %d genpd %pK genpd_link %pK\n",
> + __func__, vfe->id, vfe->genpd, vfe->genpd_link);
> +
> if (!vfe->genpd)
> return;
>
> @@ -609,7 +612,8 @@ void vfe_pm_domain_off(struct vfe_device *vfe)
> int vfe_pm_domain_on(struct vfe_device *vfe)
> {
> struct camss *camss = vfe->camss;
> -
> +dev_info(camss->dev, "%s VFE %d genpd %pK genpd_link %pK\n",
> + __func__, vfe->id, vfe->genpd, vfe->genpd_link);
> if (!vfe->genpd)
> return 0;
>
> ---
> bod
I think logging in pm_domain_on should be placed after device_link_add
because only NULL
will be visible.
[ 83.040694] qcom-camss 1b00020.camss: vfe_pm_domain_on VFE 1 genpd
000000009bd8355f genpd_link 0000000000000000
[ 83.049293] qcom-camss 1b00020.camss: vfe_pm_domain_on VFE 0 genpd
00000000bfb65e7c genpd_link 0000000000000000
[ 83.049353] qcom-camss 1b00020.camss: vfe_pm_domain_on VFE 1 genpd
000000009bd8355f genpd_link 00000000ccb0acd9
[ 83.049641] qcom-camss 1b00020.camss: vfe_pm_domain_off VFE 0 genpd
00000000bfb65e7c genpd_link 00000000348ac3c1
[ 83.049654] qcom-camss 1b00020.camss: vfe_pm_domain_off VFE 1 genpd
000000009bd8355f genpd_link 00000000ccb0acd9
[ 83.241498] qcom-camss 1b00020.camss: vfe_pm_domain_off VFE 1 genpd
000000009bd8355f genpd_link 0000000000000000
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-29 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-28 19:39 [PATCH v2] media: qcom: camss: fix VFE pm domain off Barnabás Czémán
2024-11-29 8:48 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2024-11-29 11:06 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2024-11-29 11:20 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2024-11-29 11:23 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2024-11-29 11:44 ` barnabas.czeman
2024-11-29 12:25 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2024-11-29 13:46 ` barnabas.czeman
2024-11-29 22:08 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2024-11-29 22:45 ` barnabas.czeman [this message]
2024-11-29 23:07 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2024-11-29 23:52 ` barnabas.czeman
2024-11-30 21:48 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2024-11-30 22:58 ` barnabas.czeman
2024-12-02 23:10 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2024-12-03 1:02 ` barnabas.czeman
2024-12-03 16:49 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2024-12-03 21:41 ` barnabas.czeman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=05e91ae70902f0cd9c47bb4197d8fef1@mainlining.org \
--to=barnabas.czeman@mainlining.org \
--cc=bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=rfoss@kernel.org \
--cc=todor.too@gmail.com \
--cc=vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org \
--cc=y.oudjana@protonmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox