The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
To: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>,
	Misbah Anjum N <misanjum@linux.ibm.com>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>, NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>,
	Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
	Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Cc: <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] SUNRPC: Address remaining cache_check_rcu() UAF in cache content files
Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 11:08:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <05f93fc4-59d7-4735-bc7d-a00d1497687a@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4bb9ed6b-1a64-406a-9239-b0560ca963cc@huawei.com>



在 2026/5/8 10:45, yangerkun 写道:
> Hello  Chuck,
> 
> 在 2026/5/8 0:12, Chuck Lever 写道:
>> Hello Erkun -
>>
>> On Thu, May 7, 2026, at 11:09 AM, yangerkun wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 在 2026/5/1 22:51, Chuck Lever 写道:
>>>> Misbah Anjum reported a use-after-free in cache_check_rcu()
>>>> reached through e_show() while sosreport was reading
>>>> /proc/fs/nfsd/exports on ppc64le.  Two fixes for that report
>>>> landed in v7.0:
>>>>
>>>>     48db892356d6 ("NFSD: Defer sub-object cleanup in export put 
>>>> callbacks")
>>>>     e7fcf179b82d ("NFSD: Hold net reference for the lifetime of / 
>>>> proc/fs/nfs/exports fd")
>>>
>>> Back to the problem fixed by this patches, I'm a little confused why
>>> this UAF can be trigged.
>>>
>>> Before this patches, svc_export_put show as follow:
>>>
>>>    368 static void svc_export_put(struct kref *ref)
>>>    369 {
>>>    370         struct svc_export *exp = container_of(ref, struct
>>> svc_export, h.ref);
>>>    371
>>>    372         path_put(&exp->ex_path);
>>>    373         auth_domain_put(exp->ex_client);
>>>    374         call_rcu(&exp->ex_rcu, svc_export_release);
>>>    375 }
>>>
>>> The auth_domain_put function releases ->name using call_rcu, and
>>> path_put may release the dentry also via call_rcu. All of this seems to
>>> prevent e_show from causing a UAF. Could you point out which line in
>>> d_path triggers the issue?
>>
>> The dentry, the mount, and the auth_domain ->name buffer all
>> end up RCU-freed (dentry_free() and delayed_free_vfsmnt in
>> fs/, svcauth_unix_domain_release_rcu() in svcauth_unix.c).
>> The eventual kfree isn't the problem.
>>
>> The problem is the synchronous teardown inside path_put(),
>> which runs before svc_export_put() ever reaches its own
>> call_rcu():
>>
>>    path_put(&exp->ex_path)
>>      -> dput(dentry)
>>         -> __dentry_kill()              [if last ref]
>>            -> __d_drop()                /* unhashes */
>>            -> dentry_unlink_inode()     /* d_inode = NULL */
>>            -> d_op->d_release() if set
>>            -> drops parent d_lockref    /* may cascade up */
>>            -> dentry_free()             /* call_rcu deferred */
>>      -> mntput(mnt)                     /* deferred via task_work */
>>
>> The dentry pointer itself is RCU-safe, so prepend_path()'s walk
>> of d_parent and d_name doesn't read freed memory.  But by the
>> time the reader gets there, __d_clear_type_and_inode() has
>> already stored NULL into d_inode, __d_drop() has broken the
>> hash linkage, and the parent's d_lockref has been decremented
>> -- which can in turn fire __dentry_kill() on the parent, and
>> on up the tree.  An e_show() that's still inside its cache RCU
>> read section walks into that half-dismantled state through
>> seq_path(), and that's the NULL deref Misbah reported.
> 
> Thank you for your detailed explanation! Yes, e_show might be called 
> when the state is partially dismantled, but after carefully reviewing 
> the code with dput up to __dentry_kill, I still cannot find anything 
> that could cause this issue. Additionally, the comments for prepend_path 
> indicate that they have already taken into account that the dentry can 
> be removed concurrently. I have also run some tests on my arm64 QEMU, 
> but I couldn't reproduce the problem either. Could you please help me 
> identify the specific line or pointer in the dentry that triggers this 
> use-after-free or null pointer issue?
> 
> Maybe I am not be very familiar with the code, which caused me to fail 
> to identify the real root cause. I'm so sorry for that.
> 
> 
> 265 char *d_path(const struct path *path, char *buf, int buflen)
> 266 {
> 267         DECLARE_BUFFER(b, buf, buflen);
> 268         struct path root;
> 269
> 270         /*
> 271          * We have various synthetic filesystems that never get 
> mounted.  On
> 272          * these filesystems dentries are never used for lookup 
> purposes, and
> 273          * thus don't need to be hashed.  They also don't need a 
> name until a
> 274          * user wants to identify the object in /proc/pid/fd/.  The 
> little hack
> 275          * below allows us to generate a name for these objects on 
> demand:
> 276          *
> 277          * Some pseudo inodes are mountable.  When they are mounted
> 278          * path->dentry == path->mnt->mnt_root.  In that case don't 
> call d_dname
> 279          * and instead have d_path return the mounted path.
> 280          */
> 281         if (path->dentry->d_op && path->dentry->d_op->d_dname &&
> 282             (!IS_ROOT(path->dentry) || path->dentry != path->mnt- 
>  >mnt_root))
> 283                 return path->dentry->d_op->d_dname(path->dentry, 
> buf, buflen);
> 284
> 285         rcu_read_lock();
> 286         get_fs_root_rcu(current->fs, &root);
> 287         if (unlikely(d_unlinked(path->dentry)))
> 288                 prepend(&b, " (deleted)", 11);
> 289         else
> 290                 prepend_char(&b, 0);
> 291         prepend_path(path, &root, &b);
> 292         rcu_read_unlock();
> 293
> 294         return extract_string(&b);
> 295 }
> 
> 
>>
>> The earlier fix (2530766492ec, "nfsd: fix UAF when access
>> ex_uuid or ex_stats") moved the kfree of ex_uuid and ex_stats
>> into svc_export_release() so those are RCU-safe now.
>> path_put() and auth_domain_put() couldn't go in there because
>> both may sleep, and call_rcu callbacks run in softirq context.
>> This series uses queue_rcu_work() instead: it defers past the
>> grace period AND runs the callback in process context, so the
>> sleeping puts move into the deferred path and the window
>> closes.
> 
> Yeah, I can get this! Thanks again for your detail explanation!

Also, could the scenario described in this commit be triggered again?

commit 69d803c40edeaf94089fbc8751c9b746cdc35044
Author: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon Dec 16 22:21:52 2024 +0800

     nfsd: Revert "nfsd: release svc_expkey/svc_export with rcu_work"

     This reverts commit f8c989a0c89a75d30f899a7cabdc14d72522bb8d.

     Before this commit, svc_export_put or expkey_put will call path_put 
with
     sync mode. After this commit, path_put will be called with async mode.
     And this can lead the unexpected results show as follow.

     mkfs.xfs -f /dev/sda
     echo "/ *(rw,no_root_squash,fsid=0)" > /etc/exports
     echo "/mnt *(rw,no_root_squash,fsid=1)" >> /etc/exports
     exportfs -ra
     service nfs-server start
     mount -t nfs -o vers=4.0 127.0.0.1:/mnt /mnt1
     mount /dev/sda /mnt/sda
     touch /mnt1/sda/file
     exportfs -r
     umount /mnt/sda # failed unexcepted

     The touch will finally call nfsd_cross_mnt, add refcount to mount, and
     then add cache_head. Before this commit, exportfs -r will call
     cache_flush to cleanup all cache_head, and path_put in
     svc_export_put/expkey_put will be finished with sync mode. So, the
     latter umount will always success. However, after this commit, path_put
     will be called with async mode, the latter umount may failed, and if
     we add some delay, umount will success too. Personally I think this bug
     and should be fixed. We first revert before bugfix patch, and then fix
     the original bug with a different way.

     Fixes: f8c989a0c89a ("nfsd: release svc_expkey/svc_export with 
rcu_work")
     Signed-off-by: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
     Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>


> 
> Thanks,
> Erkun.
> 
>>
>>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-08  3:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20260501-cache-uaf-fix-v1-0-a49928bf4817@oracle.com>
2026-05-05  5:32 ` [PATCH 0/6] SUNRPC: Address remaining cache_check_rcu() UAF in cache content files Jeff Layton
2026-05-05 10:49 ` Calum Mackay
2026-05-05 10:53   ` Chuck Lever
2026-05-07  9:09 ` yangerkun
2026-05-07 16:12   ` Chuck Lever
2026-05-08  2:45     ` yangerkun
2026-05-08  3:08       ` yangerkun [this message]
2026-05-08  8:16         ` yangerkun
2026-05-08 13:00           ` yangerkun
2026-05-08 20:47             ` Chuck Lever
2026-05-09  9:41               ` yangerkun
2026-05-10 16:18                 ` Chuck Lever

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=05f93fc4-59d7-4735-bc7d-a00d1497687a@huawei.com \
    --to=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=anna@kernel.org \
    --cc=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=misanjum@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=neil@brown.name \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    --cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox