From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB5F5390CAB; Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:08:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787170115; cv=none; b=IImSp4fBZZHhWVo0CGIbEhhKvzS1dwGnFC4jAHo6wEwd3y7EbKB/+K/nk/KNR5h7VIWlRN5flhUSgnv6zMVBM4xeoPv/wuv2TexvN54s8oeYZLNZrJcncQYoTd90rHOFbhBqIQ4mlRN3IqjllsDNxXfwS1gtqS/KPaMs3bcF9k0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787170115; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UoD2llVl1cMPafKga/q2Sl5f1KAANyS77u+fnt4/V3M=; h=Date:Message-ID:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=sYycFxAaOrULXo71aunY4iclW25UUZ0xnKImp7dlhr5CtIdgGerEiLVjAqGyfl3KIfelWHfyM2/XD4d5voTkXMB+OgL8hFwvA9+xVOOJddm5ADkob+b+d2yZC9ByOfstXTq/Zw9IUnL/Zu8hCf0WNyQCH8igoder5PAOGvF4Kyw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=YyW5m3xN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="YyW5m3xN" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF0C71F000E9; Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:08:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1787170113; bh=DWefprdCjuMlbolzkZB8hlEHgmZcllsAC6tbOy7bxGA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=YyW5m3xNH/5e46dKNtn0XxnDZN7+2UC+kY42cPsvM2JmJVC7s0ICfOIIOZMUOrINf aAUiFbLpN1oUFhewg//M7y4h1/96sGH41MnGGXB+oZps5iWpp3MYL7RZ3nxN1RgHro sb3uFKr8xm+zAluEVTFnJ+NYL4OclXcAO/2BoQ4D2h/p/DfE+9pxqNQZAWF1kLD4Pz SA4JRA/0bvufOO3wa7kgbXW5kuQqKFAiAkgo26BCJH9XfdT+0RL1/XOvgFgCX+MUHh pVqPeONrn6WlmoCUQmDEl5h1VSHemZbhZW9wMu3xF0cvo80nG0tKhSMfPiZ6KbpCpc +plsBMAdY+TZg== Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 10:08:32 -1000 Message-ID: <05fa2ecdf1468ca7454244941343626f@kernel.org> From: Tejun Heo To: luoliang@kylinos.cn Cc: David Vernet , Andrea Righi , Changwoo Min , Emil Tsalapatis , sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Docs/admin-guide/cgroup-v2: document BPF scheduler callbacks for cpu.max and cpu.idle In-Reply-To: <20260819031244.178638-2-luoliang@kylinos.cn> References: <20260819031244.178638-1-luoliang@kylinos.cn> <20260819031244.178638-2-luoliang@kylinos.cn> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hello, On Wed, Aug 19, 2026 at 11:12:43AM +0800, luoliang@kylinos.cn wrote: > - This file affects only processes under the fair-class scheduler. > + This file affects only processes under the fair-class scheduler and a BPF > + scheduler with the ``cgroup_set_bandwidth`` callback depending on what > + the callback actually does. The "CPU Interface Files" preamble defines the categories that the interface file entries refer back to and it only knows about cgroup_set_weight: * Processes under the fair-class scheduler * Processes under a BPF scheduler with the ``cgroup_set_weight`` callback * Everything else: ``SCHED_{FIFO,RR,DEADLINE}`` and processes under a BPF scheduler without the ``cgroup_set_weight`` callback With cpu.max, cpu.max.burst and cpu.idle now referring to cgroup_set_bandwidth and cgroup_set_idle, the preamble no longer covers the entries that follow it. Can you please update the preamble to match, e.g. by making the bullets refer to the corresponding cgroup_set_* callback, and resend? Thanks. -- tejun