* Tyan s2466 stability @ 2002-07-16 11:23 SCoTT SMeDLeY 2002-07-16 11:58 ` Richard B. Johnson 2002-07-16 14:08 ` Maxwell Spangler 0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: SCoTT SMeDLeY @ 2002-07-16 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel; +Cc: ss Hi all, I'm considering investing in a dual-AMD system using Tyan's s2466 motherboard. I'm interested in hearing how others have found the stability of this board using recent 2.4.x kernels. I've scanned the archives & there doesn't appear to be any reports on problems with this board, so I guess I'm hoping to hear some positive reports ... I'm also interested in hearing reports about how the board performs with with non-ECC (non-registered) RAM as the board has been documented to work with such an arrangement. I'm happy to fork out for ECC RAM, but is it worth it? Please reply to: ss@aao.gov.au SCoTT. :) -- ss@aao.gov.au ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: Tyan s2466 stability 2002-07-16 11:23 Tyan s2466 stability SCoTT SMeDLeY @ 2002-07-16 11:58 ` Richard B. Johnson 2002-07-16 14:05 ` Alan Cox 2002-07-16 14:08 ` Maxwell Spangler 1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Richard B. Johnson @ 2002-07-16 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: SCoTT SMeDLeY; +Cc: linux-kernel, ss On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, SCoTT SMeDLeY wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm considering investing in a dual-AMD system using Tyan's s2466 > motherboard. I'm interested in hearing how others have found the > stability of this board using recent 2.4.x kernels. > > I've scanned the archives & there doesn't appear to be any reports > on problems with this board, so I guess I'm hoping to hear some > positive reports ... > > I'm also interested in hearing reports about how the board performs > with with non-ECC (non-registered) RAM as the board has been > documented to work with such an arrangement. I'm happy to fork > out for ECC RAM, but is it worth it? > > Please reply to: ss@aao.gov.au > We got one here about two weeks ago. It had 2 AMD processors plus 2 'sticks' of RAM (Don't know how much). It was originally tested on an IDE drive booting Windows/2000. It worked, but a CPU had to be removed because W$ trashes drives when using two CPUs. I got to play with it for an hour. I put one of my BusLogic SCSI controllers in one of the 33MHz slots and booted Linux off an existing SCSI drive. It did not run long before crashing (I booted a SMP kernel). Again, I booted it with only one CPU and it did not crash. I don't know if it's an AMD problem or a Motherboard problem. Perhaps AMD processors don't work well in SMP, I've always used Intel with success. Nevertheless, I was entirely unimpressed with this "MPX" board. It didn't have built-in SCSI like older Tyan boards that I currently use and it didn't work very well. My AGP graphics card (G-Force) didn't work either (in graphics) although I'm told that 'newer' ones do. It is also kinda expensive (over US$200). Cheers, Dick Johnson Penguin : Linux version 2.4.18 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips). Windows-2000/Professional isn't. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: Tyan s2466 stability 2002-07-16 11:58 ` Richard B. Johnson @ 2002-07-16 14:05 ` Alan Cox 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Alan Cox @ 2002-07-16 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: root; +Cc: SCoTT SMeDLeY, linux-kernel, ss On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 12:58, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > We got one here about two weeks ago. It had 2 AMD processors plus > 2 'sticks' of RAM (Don't know how much). It was originally tested > on an IDE drive booting Windows/2000. It worked, but a CPU had to > be removed because W$ trashes drives when using two CPUs. More likely your set up was faulty > I got to play with it for an hour. I put one of my BusLogic SCSI > controllers in one of the 33MHz slots and booted Linux off an existing Sounds like hardware/PSU stuff to me > Nevertheless, I was entirely unimpressed with this "MPX" board. It > didn't have built-in SCSI like older Tyan boards that I currently use > and it didn't work very well. My AGP graphics card (G-Force) didn't > work either (in graphics) although I'm told that 'newer' ones do. I'm very happy with my MPX based board. The docs sucked, the BIOS socked, the lack of onboard USB sucked, but the rest is very nice and it seems stable enough. Power (430W PSU or bigger - and the right ones to get sufficient current on low voltage lines) and heat are big problems. I'm very happy with mine as a server box. As a desktop, or living in the same room as me I'd say definitely not. As to the lack of SCSI. I have an Adaptec/Dell Obsidian 4 port 64bit PCI SCSI controller plugged into it. It outperforms onboard scsi controllers so I don't feel the need for an onboard scsi controller to chain CD-ROMS too. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: Tyan s2466 stability 2002-07-16 11:23 Tyan s2466 stability SCoTT SMeDLeY 2002-07-16 11:58 ` Richard B. Johnson @ 2002-07-16 14:08 ` Maxwell Spangler 2002-07-16 15:28 ` Alan Cox 1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Maxwell Spangler @ 2002-07-16 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: SCoTT SMeDLeY; +Cc: linux-kernel, ss On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, SCoTT SMeDLeY wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm considering investing in a dual-AMD system using Tyan's s2466 > motherboard. I'm interested in hearing how others have found the > stability of this board using recent 2.4.x kernels. > > I've scanned the archives & there doesn't appear to be any reports > on problems with this board, so I guess I'm hoping to hear some > positive reports ... > > I'm also interested in hearing reports about how the board performs > with with non-ECC (non-registered) RAM as the board has been > documented to work with such an arrangement. I'm happy to fork > out for ECC RAM, but is it worth it? > > Please reply to: ss@aao.gov.au I have a one of these as my primary desktop system. Configuration is: Antec Performance Plus 880 (MT + 430W high quality power supply) Tyan S2466N motherborad Two AMD Athlon MP 1800+ chips Corsair PC2100 ECC Registered DIMMs 512M each x 2 Matrox G450 AGP Adaptec 2940AU SCSI PCI + HP cdr Ensonic ES1731 PCI audio onboard 3com networking Opti PCI USB card IBM 120GXP Acer 40X ATAPI cdrom 1) The CPU fans, boxed AMD retail fans, are really loud. 2) The system produces a lot of heat. It's 100F in the very top of my case right now. 3) Performance is very, very good, but... for basic Netscape, xterm, pine, etc, this system doesn't feel much different from my dual P2-400 system. 4) mp3 encoding is _really_ fast :) 5) This system has been completely stable for me, no crashes or surprise lockups. 6) I have only one issue yet to be resolved: SCSI "loss of streaming" errors when trying to burn cd-rs. I haven't taken the time to figure out what the problem is there but the fact that others aren't reporting it suggests configuration or something else specific to my system and not indicative of the MPX chipset or dual Athlon setup, etc. 7) I like the fact that Alan is using the same chipset as me for his development :) 8) My RAM, PC2100 ECC registered was $215 or so from crucial.com, and is now about $150. It's worth it to buy quality RAM and not have to worry about whether your system problems are being caused buy RAM.. Completely worth it. I'm very happy with dual Athlon and would recommend them to others. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Maxwell Spangler Program Writer Greenbelt, Maryland, U.S.A. Washington D.C. Metropolitan Area ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: Tyan s2466 stability 2002-07-16 14:08 ` Maxwell Spangler @ 2002-07-16 15:28 ` Alan Cox 2002-07-16 14:26 ` maxwax 2002-07-16 17:36 ` Stephen Lee 0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Alan Cox @ 2002-07-16 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Maxwell Spangler; +Cc: SCoTT SMeDLeY, linux-kernel, ss On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 15:08, Maxwell Spangler wrote: > 6) I have only one issue yet to be resolved: SCSI "loss of streaming" errors > when trying to burn cd-rs. I haven't taken the time to figure out what the > problem is there but the fact that others aren't reporting it suggests > configuration or something else specific to my system and not indicative of > the MPX chipset or dual Athlon setup, etc. > That one isn a unique report. MPX boards seem to have problems burning CD-R's. I have no idea why ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: Tyan s2466 stability 2002-07-16 15:28 ` Alan Cox @ 2002-07-16 14:26 ` maxwax 2002-07-16 15:47 ` Alan Cox 2002-07-16 17:36 ` Stephen Lee 1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: maxwax @ 2002-07-16 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alan Cox; +Cc: linux-kernel On 16 Jul 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 15:08, Maxwell Spangler wrote: > > 6) I have only one issue yet to be resolved: SCSI "loss of streaming" errors > > when trying to burn cd-rs. I haven't taken the time to figure out what the > > problem is there but the fact that others aren't reporting it suggests > > configuration or something else specific to my system and not indicative of > > the MPX chipset or dual Athlon setup, etc. > > > > That one isn a unique report. MPX boards seem to have problems burning > CD-R's. I have no idea why I thought my SCSI problems were only showing up with my cd-rw drive because that's all I currently have online. You're stating that the problems reported have been with cd-rw drives, but not with hard drives, scanners, etc, using the same SCSI equipment on the same systems? I had assumed that my failure to be able to use my cd-rw drive would prevent me from [writing] to any type of SCSI drive reliably. I even thought I had an HP SCSI DDS drive that failed along similar reasons.. Can I do anything to help provide more information to diagnose and resolve this? Replacement of my HP SCSI cdrw drive with a nice new ATAPI 40x writer is not a problem, but the fear that there is an open issue in my system in something as significant as SCSI is bothersome.. Thanks! -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Maxwell Spangler Program Writer Greenbelt, Maryland, U.S.A. Washington D.C. Metropolitan Area ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: Tyan s2466 stability 2002-07-16 14:26 ` maxwax @ 2002-07-16 15:47 ` Alan Cox 2002-07-16 20:51 ` Kurt Garloff 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Alan Cox @ 2002-07-16 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: maxwax; +Cc: linux-kernel On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 15:26, maxwax@speakeasy.net wrote: > > That one isn a unique report. MPX boards seem to have problems burning > > CD-R's. I have no idea why > > I thought my SCSI problems were only showing up with my cd-rw drive because > that's all I currently have online. I've seen it with IDE burners too. I don't know what the cause is ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: Tyan s2466 stability 2002-07-16 15:47 ` Alan Cox @ 2002-07-16 20:51 ` Kurt Garloff 2002-07-16 22:10 ` Alan Cox 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Kurt Garloff @ 2002-07-16 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alan Cox; +Cc: Linux kernel list [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 893 bytes --] On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 04:47:48PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 15:26, maxwax@speakeasy.net wrote: > > > That one isn a unique report. MPX boards seem to have problems burning > > > CD-R's. I have no idea why > > > > I thought my SCSI problems were only showing up with my cd-rw drive because > > that's all I currently have online. > > I've seen it with IDE burners too. I don't know what the cause is Strange SMI stuff, maybe? Bugs with PCI arbitration that are recovered from but take time? You've probably already looked into those, though. Regards, -- Kurt Garloff <kurt@garloff.de> [Eindhoven, NL] Physics: Plasma simulations <K.Garloff@TUE.NL> [TU Eindhoven, NL] Linux: SCSI, Security <garloff@suse.de> [SuSE Nuernberg, DE] (See mail header or public key servers for PGP2 and GPG public keys.) [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: Tyan s2466 stability 2002-07-16 20:51 ` Kurt Garloff @ 2002-07-16 22:10 ` Alan Cox 2002-07-16 21:42 ` Kurt Garloff 2002-07-19 0:27 ` Kelsey Hudson 0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Alan Cox @ 2002-07-16 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kurt Garloff; +Cc: Linux kernel list On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 21:51, Kurt Garloff wrote: > > I've seen it with IDE burners too. I don't know what the cause is > > Strange SMI stuff, maybe? > Bugs with PCI arbitration that are recovered from but take time? > > You've probably already looked into those, though. I've read the errata but thats not given me any clues. The box is fast, including PCI bandwidth measurements but neither PCI card or SCSI streaming to tape or CD-R works well. The motherboard IDE works a treat and the 64bit slots give me excellent performance (but thats a raid card so I can't yet use it for tape) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: Tyan s2466 stability 2002-07-16 22:10 ` Alan Cox @ 2002-07-16 21:42 ` Kurt Garloff 2002-07-19 0:27 ` Kelsey Hudson 1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Kurt Garloff @ 2002-07-16 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alan Cox; +Cc: Linux kernel list [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2172 bytes --] Hi Alan, On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 11:10:46PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 21:51, Kurt Garloff wrote: > > Strange SMI stuff, maybe? > > Bugs with PCI arbitration that are recovered from but take time? > > > > You've probably already looked into those, though. > > I've read the errata but thats not given me any clues. The box is fast, > including PCI bandwidth measurements but neither PCI card or SCSI > streaming to tape or CD-R works well. The motherboard IDE works a treat > and the 64bit slots give me excellent performance (but thats a raid card > so I can't yet use it for tape) c't, a good german computer mag, has done some test of Dual MoBos a month ago. (c't, 12/02, p.188). They performed some low-level benchmarks ... on PCI ... transfer rates on different PCI slots with and without parallel access to IDE. They used RocketDrive (RD), a solid-state HD, to test. Funnily, all mainboards had one or another low number in there. For the Tyan MPX (S2466N-4M), it was writing to RD in 32bit slot with only 29 MB/s without concurrent IDE access and 24MB/s with concurrent IDE access. Of course way enough for burning CDs. Two more low numbers: When writing to RD in 64 bit PCI slot, the IDE only made 19/20 MB/s for read/write. Those tests were performed under Win AFAICS, so maybe the PCI stuff under Linux is set up differently ... These numbers itself are no reason to worry, of course, but they may indicate that arbitration may not be fair and may leave one device without data for more than a short moment. Current CD-writers are like 16x with a 4MB buffer, which means they should not be left w/o data for more than 1.7s and throughput should not go below 2.4 MB/s. OK, this is really unlikely a PCI implementation would be that unfair with test engineers noticing. Maybe strange occasional PCI aborts causing a long recovery ... Just a strange idea, of course. Regards, -- Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de> Eindhoven, NL GPG key: See mail header, key servers Linux kernel development SuSE Linux AG, Nuernberg, DE SCSI, Security [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: Tyan s2466 stability 2002-07-16 22:10 ` Alan Cox 2002-07-16 21:42 ` Kurt Garloff @ 2002-07-19 0:27 ` Kelsey Hudson 2002-07-19 1:04 ` Kelledin 1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Kelsey Hudson @ 2002-07-19 0:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alan Cox; +Cc: Kurt Garloff, Linux kernel list On 16 Jul 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 21:51, Kurt Garloff wrote: > > > I've seen it with IDE burners too. I don't know what the cause is > > > > Strange SMI stuff, maybe? > > Bugs with PCI arbitration that are recovered from but take time? > > > > You've probably already looked into those, though. > > I've read the errata but thats not given me any clues. The box is fast, > including PCI bandwidth measurements but neither PCI card or SCSI > streaming to tape or CD-R works well. The motherboard IDE works a treat > and the 64bit slots give me excellent performance (but thats a raid card > so I can't yet use it for tape) according to the amd760mpx datasheet, stuff on the 32/33MHz bus isn't allowed to busmaster while the 64/66MHz bus is operating at 66MHz. so that means the 66MHz bus needs to be throttled to 33MHz either via a 3.3V 33MHz card stuck in it, or that pretty blue jumper stuffed on the appropriate FORCE 33MHz header on the board. these kind of problems will cause things like loss of streaming due to the inability to busmaster. both of my dual athlon systems here at cti have that jumper shorted. sure, i still run into problems, but then again, what chipset for amd processors doesn't have a whole load of issues? overall, i can't say i'm satisfied with any athlon chipset on the market right now. but, the 760mpx has far fewer issues than, say, any garden variety via board. (no comments from the peanut gallery -- my mind is made up and in this respect, your opinion means nothing to me. via sucks. end of story). but, i digress. aside from these rather annoying pci quirks and a sensors issue (who in their right mind assigns the same i2c address for two different chips?!) the board works quite well in the configuration i've got it in (beowulf cluster). oh and all the devices on this board are fully acpi controlled. let it be known that i hate acpi, and especially the headaches that it causes me. the stock bios also sucks quite vigorously and should be avoided at all costs (read: upgrade to the latest bios rev immediately). if you need help integrating one of these boards into your system i may be able to provide some insight. good luck. Kelsey Hudson khudson@compendium.us Software Engineer/UNIX Systems Administrator Compendium Technologies, Inc (619) 725-0771 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: Tyan s2466 stability 2002-07-19 0:27 ` Kelsey Hudson @ 2002-07-19 1:04 ` Kelledin 2002-07-20 0:40 ` Kelsey Hudson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Kelledin @ 2002-07-19 1:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel On Thursday 18 July 2002 07:27 pm, Kelsey Hudson wrote: > according to the amd760mpx datasheet, stuff on the 32/33MHz > bus isn't allowed to busmaster while the 64/66MHz bus is > operating at 66MHz. so that means the 66MHz bus needs to be > throttled to 33MHz either via a 3.3V 33MHz card stuck in it, > or that pretty blue jumper stuffed on the appropriate FORCE > 33MHz header on the board. VERY nice info, thanx. ;) I'll have to save this info for myself; I've always been planning to get a dual Athlon setup sooner or later. > these kind of problems will cause things like loss of > streaming due to the inability to busmaster. both of my dual > athlon systems here at cti have that jumper shorted. sure, i > still run into problems, but then again, what chipset for amd > processors doesn't have a whole load of issues? overall, i > can't say i'm satisfied with any athlon chipset on the market > right now. but, the 760mpx has far fewer issues than, say, any > garden variety via board. (no comments from the peanut gallery > -- my mind is made up and in this respect, your opinion means > nothing to me. via sucks. end of story). but, i digress. Yes, VIA sucks. I've been lucky so far (all my VIA chipsets can be shoe-horned to stability), but it hasn't always been easy. > aside from these rather annoying pci quirks and a sensors > issue (who in their right mind assigns the same i2c address > for two different chips?!) the board works quite well in the > configuration i've got it in (beowulf cluster). > > oh and all the devices on this board are fully acpi > controlled. let it be known that i hate acpi, and especially > the headaches that it causes me. the stock bios also sucks > quite vigorously and should be avoided at all costs (read: > upgrade to the latest bios rev immediately). > > if you need help integrating one of these boards into your > system i may be able to provide some insight. Is this motherboard using the Phoenix, AMI, or Award BIOS? Award is nice and simple and solid; AMI is ok, but often goes too much for pretty looks; Phoenix SUCKS in every way possible. What other issues have you encountered with this board (and other 760MP/MPX boards)? So far I've heard of an issue with 3com Gigabit cards on some specific model of Tyan 760MP/MPX board, but no definite details. I've also heard of lm_sensors people having a fair amount of trouble with it. -- Kelledin "If a server crashes in a server farm and no one pings it, does it still cost four figures to fix?" ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: Tyan s2466 stability 2002-07-19 1:04 ` Kelledin @ 2002-07-20 0:40 ` Kelsey Hudson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Kelsey Hudson @ 2002-07-20 0:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kelledin; +Cc: linux-kernel On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Kelledin wrote: > On Thursday 18 July 2002 07:27 pm, Kelsey Hudson wrote: > > according to the amd760mpx datasheet, stuff on the 32/33MHz > > bus isn't allowed to busmaster while the 64/66MHz bus is > > operating at 66MHz. so that means the 66MHz bus needs to be > > throttled to 33MHz either via a 3.3V 33MHz card stuck in it, > > or that pretty blue jumper stuffed on the appropriate FORCE > > 33MHz header on the board. > > VERY nice info, thanx. ;) > > I'll have to save this info for myself; I've always been planning > to get a dual Athlon setup sooner or later. Yeah, that was probably the biggest issue we had integrating these machines. That, and the need for a monstrous power supply to feed those power-hungry CPUs. [ .. ] > > if you need help integrating one of these boards into your > > system i may be able to provide some insight. > > Is this motherboard using the Phoenix, AMI, or Award BIOS? Award > is nice and simple and solid; AMI is ok, but often goes too much > for pretty looks; Phoenix SUCKS in every way possible. Alas, it's PhoenixBIOS. Phoenix bought Award, though, so I'd expect Award to be phased out :( > What other issues have you encountered with this board (and other > 760MP/MPX boards)? So far I've heard of an issue with 3com > Gigabit cards on some specific model of Tyan 760MP/MPX board, > but no definite details. I've also heard of lm_sensors people > having a fair amount of trouble with it. This is my only experience with a dual Athlon board. There were some minor issues in kernel-space when we first bought these machines; using a recent (>2.4.18) kernel causes these problems to mostly disappear. I helped the lm_sensors team with the sensors on this board; after extensive experimentation I managed to get both of the sensors chips (which are at the same I2C address ... WTF was tyan thinking?!) working and displaying data. I still am unsure which temperature sensor monitors which peripheral, but I've got a pretty good idea of it. If something strange comes up, LMK and I might have a solution for you. -- Kelsey Hudson khudson@compendium.us Software Engineer/UNIX Systems Administrator Compendium Technologies, Inc (619) 725-0771 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* RE: Tyan s2466 stability 2002-07-16 15:28 ` Alan Cox 2002-07-16 14:26 ` maxwax @ 2002-07-16 17:36 ` Stephen Lee 2002-07-16 17:43 ` Bobby Hitt 1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Stephen Lee @ 2002-07-16 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Alan Cox', linux-kernel I have the A7M266-D with an AOPEN 24x10x32 IDE CDRW and haven't had a single failure yet while burning CD-R(W)'s. By the way, are you still using this same motherboard? Steve -----Original Message----- From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Alan Cox Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:29 AM To: Maxwell Spangler Cc: SCoTT SMeDLeY; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; ss@aao.gov.au Subject: Re: Tyan s2466 stability On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 15:08, Maxwell Spangler wrote: > 6) I have only one issue yet to be resolved: SCSI "loss of streaming" errors > when trying to burn cd-rs. I haven't taken the time to figure out what the > problem is there but the fact that others aren't reporting it suggests > configuration or something else specific to my system and not indicative of > the MPX chipset or dual Athlon setup, etc. > That one isn a unique report. MPX boards seem to have problems burning CD-R's. I have no idea why - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* (no subject) 2002-07-16 17:36 ` Stephen Lee @ 2002-07-16 17:43 ` Bobby Hitt 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Bobby Hitt @ 2002-07-16 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel unsubscribe bobhitt@bscnet.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-07-20 0:38 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2002-07-16 11:23 Tyan s2466 stability SCoTT SMeDLeY 2002-07-16 11:58 ` Richard B. Johnson 2002-07-16 14:05 ` Alan Cox 2002-07-16 14:08 ` Maxwell Spangler 2002-07-16 15:28 ` Alan Cox 2002-07-16 14:26 ` maxwax 2002-07-16 15:47 ` Alan Cox 2002-07-16 20:51 ` Kurt Garloff 2002-07-16 22:10 ` Alan Cox 2002-07-16 21:42 ` Kurt Garloff 2002-07-19 0:27 ` Kelsey Hudson 2002-07-19 1:04 ` Kelledin 2002-07-20 0:40 ` Kelsey Hudson 2002-07-16 17:36 ` Stephen Lee 2002-07-16 17:43 ` Bobby Hitt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox