From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"Wieczor-Retman, Maciej" <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
"shuah@kernel.org" <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] selftests/resctrl: Adjust effective L3 cache size with SNC enabled
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 09:17:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <07325558-c816-42ec-9f74-464df2f98e9f@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SJ1PR11MB60835941880FC77E1B1E9FEFFCFC2@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Tony and Maciej,
On 5/30/24 5:34 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
>>>>> When SNC mode is enabled the effective amount of L3 cache available
>>>>> for allocation is divided by the number of nodes per L3.
>>>>
>>>> This was a mistake in original implementation and no longer done.
>>>
>>> My original kernel code adjusted value reported in the "size" file in resctrl.
>>> That's no longer done because the effective size depends on how applications
>>> are allocating and using memory. Since the kernel can't know that, it
>>> seemed best to just report the total size of the cache.
>>>
>>> But I think the resctrl tests still need to take this into account when running
>>> llc_occupancy tests.
>>>
>>> E.g. on a 2-way SNC system with a 100MB L3 cache a test that allocates
>>> memory from its local SNC node (default behavior without using libnuma)
>>> will only see 50 MB llc_occupancy with a fully populated L3 mask in the
>>> schemata file.
>>
>> This seems to contradict the "Cache and memory bandwidth allocation features
>> continue to operate at the scope of the L3 cache." statement from [1]?
>
> I'll clean that up. MBA isn't affected. But cache allocation is affected in that
> the amount of cache represented by each bit in the masks in the schemata
> file is reduced by a factor equal to SNC nodes per L3 cache.
Thanks Tony. I trust that this is what Maciej intended since the change
is specifically named "Adjuct _effective_ L3 cache size". I'd like to
recommend that your comments be added before the change to
get_cache_size() ...
/*
* The amount of cache represented by each bit in the masks
* in the schemata file is reduced by a factor equal to SNC
* nodes per L3 cache.
* E.g. on a SNC-2 system with a 100MB L3 cache a test that
* allocates memory from its local SNC node (default behavior
* without using libnuma) will only see 50 MB llc_occupancy
* with a fully populated L3 mask in the schemata file.
*/
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-31 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-15 11:17 [PATCH v2 0/2] selftests/resctrl: SNC kernel support discovery Maciej Wieczor-Retman
2024-05-15 11:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] selftests/resctrl: Adjust effective L3 cache size with SNC enabled Maciej Wieczor-Retman
2024-05-15 16:48 ` Luck, Tony
2024-05-16 6:01 ` Maciej Wieczor-Retman
2024-05-30 23:07 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-30 23:46 ` Luck, Tony
2024-05-30 23:51 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-31 0:34 ` Luck, Tony
2024-05-31 16:17 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2024-06-25 11:04 ` Maciej Wieczor-Retman
2024-06-25 16:28 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-26 7:09 ` Maciej Wieczor-Retman
2024-06-26 16:46 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-27 9:50 ` Maciej Wieczor-Retman
2024-06-27 16:30 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-28 7:52 ` Maciej Wieczor-Retman
2024-05-15 11:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] selftests/resctrl: Adjust SNC support messages Maciej Wieczor-Retman
2024-05-30 23:07 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-31 6:39 ` Maciej Wieczor-Retman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=07325558-c816-42ec-9f74-464df2f98e9f@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox