* [PATCH] nvme: clear nvme request for nonready request
@ 2025-06-28 6:46 Yu Kuai
2025-06-28 10:13 ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-07-14 13:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yu Kuai @ 2025-06-28 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kbusch, axboe, hch, sagi
Cc: yi.zhang, linux-nvme, linux-kernel, yukuai3, yukuai1, yi.zhang,
yangerkun, johnny.chenyi
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
It's found nvme mpath IO inflight counter can be decreased to negtive by
following stack:
CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 466 Comm: kworker/12:1H Tainted: G
6.16.0-rc3.yu+ #2 PREEMPT(voluntary)
Workqueue: kblockd blk_mq_run_work_fn
RIP: 0010:bdev_end_io_acct+0x494/0x5c0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
nvme_end_req+0x4d/0x70 [nvme_core]
nvme_failover_req+0x3bd/0x530 [nvme_core]
nvme_fail_nonready_command+0x12c/0x170 [nvme_core]
nvme_fc_queue_rq+0x463/0x720 [nvme_fc]
blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x358/0x1260
__blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x2dd/0x480
blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0xa6/0x140
blk_mq_run_work_fn+0x1bb/0x2a0
process_one_work+0x8ca/0x1950
worker_thread+0x58d/0xcf0
kthread+0x3d5/0x7a0
ret_from_fork+0x403/0x510
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
</TASK>
The IO inflight counter is not increased from nvme_fail_nonready_command()
yet, hence decrease it will cause it to be negative.
This is not a problem for blk-mq request because it's already
initialized before issuing, however, nvme request is only initialized from
following nvme_setup_cmd(). Fix the problem by clearing it in
nvme_fail_nonready_command().
Reported-by: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHj4cs_+dauobyYyP805t33WMJVzOWj=7+51p4_j9rA63D9sog@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
---
drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index 92697f98c601..8caafa25c010 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -764,6 +764,9 @@ blk_status_t nvme_fail_nonready_command(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl,
!test_bit(NVME_CTRL_FAILFAST_EXPIRED, &ctrl->flags) &&
!blk_noretry_request(rq) && !(rq->cmd_flags & REQ_NVME_MPATH))
return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
+
+ if (!(rq->rq_flags & RQF_DONTPREP))
+ nvme_clear_nvme_request(rq);
return nvme_host_path_error(rq);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_fail_nonready_command);
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] nvme: clear nvme request for nonready request
2025-06-28 6:46 [PATCH] nvme: clear nvme request for nonready request Yu Kuai
@ 2025-06-28 10:13 ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-07-14 13:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sagi Grimberg @ 2025-06-28 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yu Kuai, kbusch, axboe, hch
Cc: yi.zhang, linux-nvme, linux-kernel, yukuai3, yi.zhang, yangerkun,
johnny.chenyi
First, we need change the patch title to clarify that it fixes a bug.
i.e. something like:
nvme: fix nvme-mpath misaccounting of inflight active IO
Second, we need to add a fixes tag (i.e. addition of nvme-mpath
nr_active accounting)
Third, we need a code-comment that explains this subtlety because it is
not trivial.
On 28/06/2025 9:46, Yu Kuai wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
>
> It's found nvme mpath IO inflight counter can be decreased to negtive by
> following stack:
>
> CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 466 Comm: kworker/12:1H Tainted: G
> 6.16.0-rc3.yu+ #2 PREEMPT(voluntary)
> Workqueue: kblockd blk_mq_run_work_fn
> RIP: 0010:bdev_end_io_acct+0x494/0x5c0
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> nvme_end_req+0x4d/0x70 [nvme_core]
> nvme_failover_req+0x3bd/0x530 [nvme_core]
> nvme_fail_nonready_command+0x12c/0x170 [nvme_core]
> nvme_fc_queue_rq+0x463/0x720 [nvme_fc]
> blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x358/0x1260
> __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x2dd/0x480
> blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0xa6/0x140
> blk_mq_run_work_fn+0x1bb/0x2a0
> process_one_work+0x8ca/0x1950
> worker_thread+0x58d/0xcf0
> kthread+0x3d5/0x7a0
> ret_from_fork+0x403/0x510
> ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
> </TASK>
>
> The IO inflight counter is not increased from nvme_fail_nonready_command()
> yet, hence decrease it will cause it to be negative.
>
> This is not a problem for blk-mq request because it's already
> initialized before issuing, however, nvme request is only initialized from
> following nvme_setup_cmd(). Fix the problem by clearing it in
> nvme_fail_nonready_command().
>
> Reported-by: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHj4cs_+dauobyYyP805t33WMJVzOWj=7+51p4_j9rA63D9sog@mail.gmail.com/
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index 92697f98c601..8caafa25c010 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -764,6 +764,9 @@ blk_status_t nvme_fail_nonready_command(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl,
> !test_bit(NVME_CTRL_FAILFAST_EXPIRED, &ctrl->flags) &&
> !blk_noretry_request(rq) && !(rq->cmd_flags & REQ_NVME_MPATH))
> return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
> +
> + if (!(rq->rq_flags & RQF_DONTPREP))
> + nvme_clear_nvme_request(rq);
> return nvme_host_path_error(rq);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_fail_nonready_command);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] nvme: clear nvme request for nonready request
2025-06-28 6:46 [PATCH] nvme: clear nvme request for nonready request Yu Kuai
2025-06-28 10:13 ` Sagi Grimberg
@ 2025-07-14 13:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-15 1:08 ` Yu Kuai
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2025-07-14 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yu Kuai
Cc: kbusch, axboe, hch, sagi, yi.zhang, linux-nvme, linux-kernel,
yukuai3, yi.zhang, yangerkun, johnny.chenyi
Are you going to resend this with the feedback from Sagi taken into
account?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] nvme: clear nvme request for nonready request
2025-07-14 13:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2025-07-15 1:08 ` Yu Kuai
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yu Kuai @ 2025-07-15 1:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig, Yu Kuai
Cc: kbusch, axboe, sagi, yi.zhang, linux-nvme, linux-kernel, yi.zhang,
yangerkun, johnny.chenyi, yukuai (C)
Hi,
在 2025/07/14 21:42, Christoph Hellwig 写道:
> Are you going to resend this with the feedback from Sagi taken into
> account?
>
Sure, sorry that I totally forgot about this patch.
Thanks,
Kuai
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-07-15 1:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-06-28 6:46 [PATCH] nvme: clear nvme request for nonready request Yu Kuai
2025-06-28 10:13 ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-07-14 13:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-15 1:08 ` Yu Kuai
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).