From: "Chen, Rong A" <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [LKP] Re: [mm/debug] fa6726c1e7: kernel_BUG_at_include/linux/mm.h
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 20:52:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <07ea0efd-0145-eaaf-c628-e48957154a2c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b62c66c8-1550-087f-f5d2-b33a18bb0edc@arm.com>
On 4/29/2020 11:28 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
> On 04/28/2020 02:51 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:41:11AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
>>> On Apr 28, 2020, at 1:54 AM, Anshuman Khandual <Anshuman.Khandual@arm.com> wrote:
>>>> That is true. There is a slight change in the rules, making it explicit yes
>>>> only when both ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE and DEBUG_VM are enabled.
>>>>
>>>> +config DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE
>>>> + bool "Debug arch page table for semantics compliance"
>>>> + depends on MMU
>>>> + depends on !IA64 && !ARM
>>>> + depends on ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE || EXPERT
>>>> + default y if ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE && DEBUG_VM
>>>> + help
>>>>
>>>> The default is really irrelevant as the config option can be set explicitly.
>>> That could also explain. Since not long time ago, it was only “default
>>> y if DEBUG_VM”, that caused the robot saved a .config with
>>> DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE=y by default.
>>>
>>> Even though you changed the rule recently, it has no effect as the
>>> robot could “make oldconfig” from the saved config for each linux-next
>>> tree execution and the breakage will go on.
>> I'm not entirely sure that's the case. This report still points at the
>> old commit fa6726c1e7 which has:
>>
>> + depends on ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE || EXPERT
>> + default n if !ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE
>> + default y if DEBUG_VM
>>
>> In -next we now have commit 647d9a0de34c and subsequently modified by
>> commit 0a8646638865. So hopefully with the latest -next tree we won't
>> see this report.
> Could some one from LKP test framework, please confirm if this still causes
> above problem on the latest linux-next by default ?
Hi,
The .config is a rand config, the problem is still exist if run "make
oldconfig" for the config
with commit 0a8646638865.
$ grep -e CONFIG_MMU= -e CONFIG_EXPERT= -e
CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE= -e CONFIG_DEBUG_VM= .config
CONFIG_EXPERT=y
CONFIG_MMU=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_VM=y
should we disable DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE by default?
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-29 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-27 14:07 [mm/debug] fa6726c1e7: kernel_BUG_at_include/linux/mm.h kernel test robot
2020-04-28 1:48 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-04-28 2:05 ` Qian Cai
2020-04-28 2:35 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-04-28 2:51 ` Qian Cai
2020-04-28 3:53 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-04-28 5:24 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 5:53 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-04-28 6:12 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 7:59 ` Qian Cai
2020-04-28 8:41 ` Qian Cai
2020-04-28 9:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-29 3:28 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-04-29 12:52 ` Chen, Rong A [this message]
2020-04-29 18:15 ` [LKP] " Catalin Marinas
2020-04-29 18:34 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-30 2:38 ` Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=07ea0efd-0145-eaaf-c628-e48957154a2c@intel.com \
--to=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vgupta@synopsys.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox