* [PATCH -next] xen/pvcalls: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock
@ 2017-12-28 3:46 Wei Yongjun
2018-01-02 8:35 ` Juergen Gross
2018-01-02 18:26 ` Boris Ostrovsky
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yongjun @ 2017-12-28 3:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Boris Ostrovsky, Juergen Gross, Stefano Stabellini
Cc: Wei Yongjun, xen-devel, linux-kernel
A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC.
Fixes: 9774c6cca266 ("xen/pvcalls: implement accept command")
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
---
drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
index 0c1ec68..dfd00d9 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
@@ -807,7 +807,7 @@ int pvcalls_front_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock, int flags)
pvcalls_exit();
return ret;
}
- map2 = kzalloc(sizeof(*map2), GFP_KERNEL);
+ map2 = kzalloc(sizeof(*map2), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (map2 == NULL) {
clear_bit(PVCALLS_FLAG_ACCEPT_INFLIGHT,
(void *)&map->passive.flags);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next] xen/pvcalls: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock
2017-12-28 3:46 [PATCH -next] xen/pvcalls: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock Wei Yongjun
@ 2018-01-02 8:35 ` Juergen Gross
2018-01-02 18:26 ` Boris Ostrovsky
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Juergen Gross @ 2018-01-02 8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Yongjun, Boris Ostrovsky, Stefano Stabellini; +Cc: xen-devel, linux-kernel
On 28/12/17 04:46, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC.
>
> Fixes: 9774c6cca266 ("xen/pvcalls: implement accept command")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Juergen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next] xen/pvcalls: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock
2017-12-28 3:46 [PATCH -next] xen/pvcalls: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock Wei Yongjun
2018-01-02 8:35 ` Juergen Gross
@ 2018-01-02 18:26 ` Boris Ostrovsky
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Boris Ostrovsky @ 2018-01-02 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Yongjun, Juergen Gross, Stefano Stabellini; +Cc: xen-devel, linux-kernel
On 12/27/2017 10:46 PM, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC.
>
> Fixes: 9774c6cca266 ("xen/pvcalls: implement accept command")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Applied to for-linus-4.15
-boris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-01-02 18:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-12-28 3:46 [PATCH -next] xen/pvcalls: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock Wei Yongjun
2018-01-02 8:35 ` Juergen Gross
2018-01-02 18:26 ` Boris Ostrovsky
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).