From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: kan.liang@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ak@linux.intel.com, zide.chen@intel.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
broonie@kernel.org, ravi.bangoria@amd.com, eranian@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 11/17] perf/x86: Add eGPRs into sample_regs
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 18:01:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0858437c-e088-4e08-86fa-7ef08fd314a6@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250815213435.1702022-12-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
On 8/16/2025 5:34 AM, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>
> The eGPRs is only supported when the new SIMD registers configuration
> method is used, which moves the XMM to sample_simd_vec_regs. So the
> space can be reclaimed for the eGPRs.
>
> The eGPRs is retrieved by XSAVE. Only support the eGPRs for X86_64.
>
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/events/core.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++------
> arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 4 +++
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++--
> arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c | 31 ++++++++++-----------
> 4 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> index 1fa550efcdfa..f816290defc1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> @@ -432,6 +432,8 @@ static void x86_pmu_get_ext_regs(struct x86_perf_regs *perf_regs, u64 mask)
> perf_regs->h16zmm = get_xsave_addr(xsave, XFEATURE_Hi16_ZMM);
> if (valid_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_OPMASK)
> perf_regs->opmask = get_xsave_addr(xsave, XFEATURE_OPMASK);
> + if (valid_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_APX)
> + perf_regs->egpr = get_xsave_addr(xsave, XFEATURE_APX);
> }
>
> static void release_ext_regs_buffers(void)
> @@ -709,17 +711,33 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
> }
>
> if (event->attr.sample_type & (PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR | PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER)) {
> - /*
> - * Besides the general purpose registers, XMM registers may
> - * be collected as well.
> - */
> - if (event_has_extended_regs(event)) {
> - if (!(event->pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS))
> + if (event->attr.sample_simd_regs_enabled) {
> + u64 reserved = ~GENMASK_ULL(PERF_REG_X86_64_MAX - 1, 0);
> +
> + if (!(event->pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_SIMD_REGS))
> return -EINVAL;
> - if (!(x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_SSE))
> + /*
> + * The XMM space in the perf_event_x86_regs is reclaimed
> + * for eGPRs and other general registers.
> + */
> + if (event->attr.sample_regs_user & reserved ||
> + event->attr.sample_regs_intr & reserved)
> return -EINVAL;
> - if (event->attr.sample_simd_regs_enabled)
> + if ((event->attr.sample_regs_user & PERF_X86_EGPRS_MASK ||
> + event->attr.sample_regs_intr & PERF_X86_EGPRS_MASK) &&
> + !(x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_APX))
> return -EINVAL;
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * Besides the general purpose registers, XMM registers may
> + * be collected as well.
> + */
> + if (event_has_extended_regs(event)) {
> + if (!(event->pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (!(x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_SSE))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> }
>
> if (event_has_simd_regs(event)) {
> @@ -1881,6 +1899,11 @@ void x86_pmu_setup_regs_data(struct perf_event *event,
> perf_regs->opmask_regs = NULL;
> mask |= XFEATURE_MASK_OPMASK;
> }
> + if (attr->sample_regs_user & PERF_X86_EGPRS_MASK ||
> + attr->sample_regs_intr & PERF_X86_EGPRS_MASK) {
> + perf_regs->egpr_regs = NULL;
> + mask |= XFEATURE_MASK_APX;
> + }
> }
>
> mask &= ~ignore_mask;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
> index dda677022882..4400cb66bc8e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
> @@ -613,6 +613,10 @@ struct x86_perf_regs {
> u64 *opmask_regs;
> struct avx_512_opmask_state *opmask;
> };
> + union {
> + u64 *egpr_regs;
> + struct apx_state *egpr;
> + };
> };
>
> extern unsigned long perf_arch_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> index dd7bd1dd8d39..cd0f6804debf 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> @@ -27,11 +27,31 @@ enum perf_event_x86_regs {
> PERF_REG_X86_R13,
> PERF_REG_X86_R14,
> PERF_REG_X86_R15,
> + /* Extended GPRs (EGPRs) */
> + PERF_REG_X86_R16,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R17,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R18,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R19,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R20,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R21,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R22,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R23,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R24,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R25,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R26,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R27,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R28,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R29,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R30,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R31,
> /* These are the limits for the GPRs. */
> PERF_REG_X86_32_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_GS + 1,
> - PERF_REG_X86_64_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_R15 + 1,
> + PERF_REG_X86_64_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_R31 + 1,
>
> - /* These all need two bits set because they are 128bit */
> + /*
> + * These all need two bits set because they are 128bit.
> + * These are only available when !PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD
> + */
The eGPR indexes are overlapped with XMM indexes. User may get confused
about this, we'd better add comments to explain it.
> PERF_REG_X86_XMM0 = 32,
> PERF_REG_X86_XMM1 = 34,
> PERF_REG_X86_XMM2 = 36,
> @@ -55,6 +75,8 @@ enum perf_event_x86_regs {
>
> #define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK (~((1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_XMM0) - 1))
>
> +#define PERF_X86_EGPRS_MASK GENMASK_ULL(PERF_REG_X86_R31, PERF_REG_X86_R16)
> +
> #define PERF_X86_SIMD_PRED_REGS_MAX 8
> #define PERF_X86_SIMD_PRED_MASK GENMASK(PERF_X86_SIMD_PRED_REGS_MAX - 1, 0)
> #define PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_REGS_MAX 32
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
> index 5e815f806605..b6e50194ff3e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
> @@ -83,14 +83,22 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
> {
> struct x86_perf_regs *perf_regs;
>
> - if (idx >= PERF_REG_X86_XMM0 && idx < PERF_REG_X86_XMM_MAX) {
> + if (idx > PERF_REG_X86_R15) {
> perf_regs = container_of(regs, struct x86_perf_regs, regs);
> - /* SIMD registers are moved to dedicated sample_simd_vec_reg */
> - if (perf_regs->abi & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD)
> - return 0;
> - if (!perf_regs->xmm_regs)
> - return 0;
> - return perf_regs->xmm_regs[idx - PERF_REG_X86_XMM0];
> +
> + if (perf_regs->abi & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD) {
> + if (idx <= PERF_REG_X86_R31) {
> + if (!perf_regs->egpr_regs)
> + return 0;
> + return perf_regs->egpr_regs[idx - PERF_REG_X86_R16];
> + }
> + } else {
> + if (idx >= PERF_REG_X86_XMM0 && idx < PERF_REG_X86_XMM_MAX) {
> + if (!perf_regs->xmm_regs)
> + return 0;
> + return perf_regs->xmm_regs[idx - PERF_REG_X86_XMM0];
> + }
> + }
> }
>
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(pt_regs_offset)))
> @@ -171,14 +179,7 @@ int perf_simd_reg_validate(u16 vec_qwords, u64 vec_mask,
> ~((1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_MAX) - 1))
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> -#define REG_NOSUPPORT ((1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R8) | \
> - (1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R9) | \
> - (1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R10) | \
> - (1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R11) | \
> - (1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R12) | \
> - (1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R13) | \
> - (1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R14) | \
> - (1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R15))
> +#define REG_NOSUPPORT GENMASK_ULL(PERF_REG_X86_R31, PERF_REG_X86_R8)
>
> int perf_reg_validate(u64 mask)
> {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-20 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-15 21:34 [PATCH V3 00/17] Support vector and more extended registers in perf kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 01/17] perf/x86: Use x86_perf_regs in the x86 nmi handler kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 02/17] perf/x86: Setup the regs data kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 03/17] x86/fpu/xstate: Add xsaves_nmi kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 04/17] perf: Move has_extended_regs() to header file kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 05/17] perf/x86: Support XMM register for non-PEBS and REGS_USER kan.liang
2025-08-19 13:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-19 15:55 ` Liang, Kan
2025-08-20 9:46 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-08-20 18:03 ` Liang, Kan
2025-08-21 1:00 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 06/17] perf: Support SIMD registers kan.liang
2025-08-20 9:55 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-08-20 18:08 ` Liang, Kan
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 07/17] perf/x86: Move XMM to sample_simd_vec_regs kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 08/17] perf/x86: Add YMM into sample_simd_vec_regs kan.liang
2025-08-20 9:59 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-08-20 18:10 ` Liang, Kan
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 09/17] perf/x86: Add ZMM " kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 10/17] perf/x86: Add OPMASK into sample_simd_pred_reg kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 11/17] perf/x86: Add eGPRs into sample_regs kan.liang
2025-08-20 10:01 ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 12/17] perf/x86: Add SSP " kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [PATCH V3 13/17] perf/x86/intel: Enable PERF_PMU_CAP_SIMD_REGS kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [POC PATCH 14/17] perf/x86/regs: Only support legacy regs for the PT and PERF_REGS_MASK for now kan.liang
2025-08-25 9:07 ` Adrian Hunter
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [POC PATCH 15/17] tools headers: Sync with the kernel sources kan.liang
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [POC PATCH 16/17] perf parse-regs: Support the new SIMD format kan.liang
2025-08-20 10:04 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-08-20 18:18 ` Liang, Kan
2025-08-21 3:35 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-08-15 21:34 ` [POC PATCH 17/17] perf regs: Support the PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD kan.liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0858437c-e088-4e08-86fa-7ef08fd314a6@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).