From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf evlist: Avoid frequency mode for the dummy event
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 11:14:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <08995efc-d5af-6ba6-831b-1a483daabef4@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230916040915.1075620-1-irogers@google.com>
On 16/09/23 07:09, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Dummy events are created with an attribute where the period and freq
> are zero. evsel__config will then see the uninitialized values and
> initialize them in evsel__default_freq_period. As fequency mode is
> used by default the dummy event would be set to use frequency
> mode. However, this has no effect on the dummy event but does cause
> unnecessary timers/interrupts. Avoid this overhead by setting the
> period to 1 for dummy events.
>
> evlist__add_aux_dummy calls evlist__add_dummy then sets freq=0 and
> period=1. This isn't necessary after this change and so the setting is
> removed.
>
> From Stephane:
>
> The dummy event is not counting anything. It is used to collect mmap
> records and avoid a race condition during the synthesize mmap phase of
> perf record. As such, it should not cause any overhead during active
> profiling. Yet, it did. Because of a bug the dummy event was
> programmed as a sampling event in frequency mode. Events in that mode
> incur more kernel overheads because on timer tick, the kernel has to
> look at the number of samples for each event and potentially adjust
> the sampling period to achieve the desired frequency. The dummy event
> was therefore adding a frequency event to task and ctx contexts we may
> otherwise not have any, e.g., perf record -a -e
> cpu/event=0x3c,period=10000000/. On each timer tick the
> perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context() is invoked and if ctx->nr_freq is
> non-zero, then the kernel will loop over ALL the events of the context
> looking for frequency mode ones. In doing, so it locks the context,
> and enable/disable the PMU of each hw event. If all the events of the
> context are in period mode, the kernel will have to traverse the list for
> nothing incurring overhead. The overhead is multiplied by a very large
> factor when this happens in a guest kernel. There is no need for the
> dummy event to be in frequency mode, it does not count anything and
> therefore should not cause extra overhead for no reason.
>
> Fixes: 5bae0250237f ("perf evlist: Introduce perf_evlist__new_dummy constructor")
> Reported-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/evlist.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> index 25c3ebe2c2f5..e36da58522ef 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> @@ -251,6 +251,9 @@ static struct evsel *evlist__dummy_event(struct evlist *evlist)
> .type = PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE,
> .config = PERF_COUNT_SW_DUMMY,
> .size = sizeof(attr), /* to capture ABI version */
> + /* Avoid frequency mode for dummy events to avoid associated timers. */
> + .freq = 0,
> + .sample_period = 1,
> };
>
> return evsel__new_idx(&attr, evlist->core.nr_entries);
> @@ -277,8 +280,6 @@ struct evsel *evlist__add_aux_dummy(struct evlist *evlist, bool system_wide)
> evsel->core.attr.exclude_kernel = 1;
> evsel->core.attr.exclude_guest = 1;
> evsel->core.attr.exclude_hv = 1;
> - evsel->core.attr.freq = 0;
> - evsel->core.attr.sample_period = 1;
> evsel->core.system_wide = system_wide;
> evsel->no_aux_samples = true;
> evsel->name = strdup("dummy:u");
Note that evsel__config() will put it back to freq if -F is used.
Nevertheless:
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-18 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-16 4:09 [PATCH v1] perf evlist: Avoid frequency mode for the dummy event Ian Rogers
2023-09-17 0:45 ` Mingwei Zhang
2023-09-18 22:42 ` Ian Rogers
2023-09-21 5:04 ` Mingwei Zhang
2023-10-03 20:07 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-10-03 22:36 ` Ian Rogers
2023-10-03 23:02 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-10-11 16:14 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-10-03 23:19 ` Mingwei Zhang
2023-10-11 16:09 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-09-18 8:14 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2023-09-18 21:48 ` Ian Rogers
2023-09-19 5:59 ` Adrian Hunter
2023-09-21 19:26 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-09-22 5:36 ` Adrian Hunter
2023-09-22 15:05 ` Ian Rogers
2023-09-25 3:35 ` Yang Jihong
2023-09-25 17:37 ` Stephane Eranian
2023-09-30 6:06 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-10-30 19:04 ` Mingwei Zhang
2023-10-30 20:01 ` Mingwei Zhang
2023-10-31 5:47 ` Greg KH
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-09-16 3:56 Ian Rogers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=08995efc-d5af-6ba6-831b-1a483daabef4@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yangjihong1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox