From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753288AbdC0OHK (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Mar 2017 10:07:10 -0400 Received: from esa2.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.149.84]:30461 "EHLO esa2.microchip.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752800AbdC0OGq (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Mar 2017 10:06:46 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,231,1486450800"; d="scan'208";a="609205" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] drivers: pwm: pwm-atmel: switch to atomic PWM To: Alexandre Belloni , Boris Brezillon References: <1490189375-20384-1-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> <1490189375-20384-2-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> <20170327150237.69d8523f@bbrezillon> <20170327131530.ifexyrgrp5egtbtr@piout.net> CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , From: m18063 Message-ID: <08b1036a-bb4d-5ae2-1a68-68ccdc0b3fef@microchip.com> Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 17:05:58 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170327131530.ifexyrgrp5egtbtr@piout.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 27.03.2017 16:15, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 27/03/2017 at 15:02:37 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: >> Hi Claudiu, >> >> On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:29:34 +0200 >> Claudiu Beznea wrote: >> >>> static const struct platform_device_id atmel_pwm_devtypes[] = { >>> { >>> .name = "at91sam9rl-pwm", >>> - .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&atmel_pwm_data_v1, >>> + .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&atmel_pwm_regs_v1, >>> }, { >>> .name = "sama5d3-pwm", >>> - .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&atmel_pwm_data_v2, >>> + .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&atmel_pwm_regs_v2, >>> }, { >>> /* sentinel */ >>> }, >> Unrelated to this series, but can you prepare a patch to get rid of >> this platform id table (AT91 platforms have completely switched to DT >> for quite some time now). >> > Please, don't until AVR32 is gone. Sure, I will wait for it. > >> You can also get rid of the "if (pdev->dev.of_node)" condition in >> atmel_pwm_probe() since it's guaranteed to be true, otherwise the >> ->probe() method wouldn't be called. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Boris