From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 12/24] perf/x86/intel: Allocate arch-PEBS buffer and initialize PEBS_BASE MSR
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 10:05:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <08f9f344-4414-4819-87b9-538d8ed3b040@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250226094656.GS11590@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 2/26/2025 5:46 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 01:48:52PM +0800, Mi, Dapeng wrote:
>> On 2/25/2025 7:18 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 03:28:06PM +0000, Dapeng Mi wrote:
>>>> Arch-PEBS introduces a new MSR IA32_PEBS_BASE to store the arch-PEBS
>>>> buffer physical address. This patch allocates arch-PEBS buffer and then
>>>> initialize IA32_PEBS_BASE MSR with the buffer physical address.
>>> Not loving how this patch obscures the whole DS area thing and naming.
>> arch-PEBS uses a totally independent buffer to save the PEBS records and
>> don't use the debug store area anymore. To reuse the original function as
>> much as possible and don't mislead users to think arch-PEBS has some
>> relationship with debug store, the original key word "ds" in the function
>> names are changed to "BTS_PEBS". I know the name maybe not perfect, do you
>> have any suggestion? Thanks.
> Right, so I realize it has a new buffer, but why do you need to make it
> all complicated like this?
>
> Just leave the existing stuff and stick the new arch pebs buffer
> somewhere new. All that reserve nonsense shouldn't be needed anymore.
>
> Just add it to the intel_pmu_cpu_{prepare,starting,dying,dead} things.
Sure. would do.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-27 2:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-18 15:27 [Patch v2 00/24] Arch-PEBS and PMU supports for Clearwater Forest and Panther Lake Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:27 ` [Patch v2 01/24] perf/x86: Add dynamic constraint Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:27 ` [Patch v2 02/24] perf/x86/intel: Add Panther Lake support Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:27 ` [Patch v2 03/24] perf/x86/intel: Add PMU support for Clearwater Forest Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:27 ` [Patch v2 04/24] perf/x86/intel: Parse CPUID archPerfmonExt leaves for non-hybrid CPUs Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:27 ` [Patch v2 05/24] perf/x86/intel: Decouple BTS initialization from PEBS initialization Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 06/24] perf/x86/intel: Rename x86_pmu.pebs to x86_pmu.ds_pebs Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 07/24] perf/x86/intel: Introduce pairs of PEBS static calls Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 08/24] perf/x86/intel: Initialize architectural PEBS Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 09/24] perf/x86/intel/ds: Factor out common PEBS processing code to functions Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 10/24] perf/x86/intel: Process arch-PEBS records or record fragments Dapeng Mi
2025-02-25 10:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-25 11:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-26 5:20 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-26 9:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-26 15:45 ` Liang, Kan
2025-02-27 2:04 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-25 20:42 ` Andi Kleen
2025-02-26 2:54 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 11/24] perf/x86/intel: Factor out common functions to process PEBS groups Dapeng Mi
2025-02-25 11:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-26 5:24 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 12/24] perf/x86/intel: Allocate arch-PEBS buffer and initialize PEBS_BASE MSR Dapeng Mi
2025-02-25 11:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-26 5:48 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-26 9:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-27 2:05 ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
2025-02-25 11:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-26 6:19 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-26 9:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-27 2:09 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 13/24] perf/x86/intel: Update dyn_constranit base on PEBS event precise level Dapeng Mi
2025-02-27 14:06 ` Liang, Kan
2025-03-05 1:41 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 14/24] perf/x86/intel: Setup PEBS data configuration and enable legacy groups Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 15/24] perf/x86/intel: Add SSP register support for arch-PEBS Dapeng Mi
2025-02-25 11:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-26 6:56 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-25 11:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-25 20:44 ` Andi Kleen
2025-02-27 6:29 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 16/24] perf/x86/intel: Add counter group " Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 17/24] perf/core: Support to capture higher width vector registers Dapeng Mi
2025-02-25 20:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-26 7:55 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 18/24] perf/x86/intel: Support arch-PEBS vector registers group capturing Dapeng Mi
2025-02-25 15:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-26 8:08 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-27 6:40 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-03-04 3:08 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-03-04 16:26 ` Liang, Kan
2025-03-05 1:34 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 19/24] perf tools: Support to show SSP register Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 20/24] perf tools: Enhance arch__intr/user_reg_mask() helpers Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 21/24] perf tools: Enhance sample_regs_user/intr to capture more registers Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 22/24] perf tools: Support to capture more vector registers (x86/Intel) Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 23/24] perf tools/tests: Add vector registers PEBS sampling test Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 24/24] perf tools: Fix incorrect --user-regs comments Dapeng Mi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=08f9f344-4414-4819-87b9-538d8ed3b040@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox