From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ak@suse.de, tony.luck@intel.com, Asit.K.Mallick@intel.com
Subject: [patch 2.6.13 2/6] swiotlb: cleanup some code duplication cruft
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:48:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <09122005104850.30992@bilbo.tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <09122005104850.30928@bilbo.tuxdriver.com>
The implementations of swiotlb_sync_single_for_{cpu,device} are
identical. Likewise for swiotlb_syng_sg_for_{cpu,device}. This patch
move the guts of those functions to two new inline functions, and
calls the appropriate one from the bodies of those functions.
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
---
lib/swiotlb.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/swiotlb.c b/lib/swiotlb.c
--- a/lib/swiotlb.c
+++ b/lib/swiotlb.c
@@ -492,9 +492,9 @@ swiotlb_unmap_single(struct device *hwde
* address back to the card, you must first perform a
* swiotlb_dma_sync_for_device, and then the device again owns the buffer
*/
-void
-swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
- size_t size, int dir)
+static inline void
+swiotlb_sync_single(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
+ size_t size, int dir)
{
char *dma_addr = phys_to_virt(dev_addr);
@@ -507,17 +507,17 @@ swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu(struct devic
}
void
+swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
+ size_t size, int dir)
+{
+ swiotlb_sync_single(hwdev, dev_addr, size, dir);
+}
+
+void
swiotlb_sync_single_for_device(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
size_t size, int dir)
{
- char *dma_addr = phys_to_virt(dev_addr);
-
- if (dir == DMA_NONE)
- BUG();
- if (dma_addr >= io_tlb_start && dma_addr < io_tlb_end)
- sync_single(hwdev, dma_addr, size, dir);
- else if (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE)
- mark_clean(dma_addr, size);
+ swiotlb_sync_single(hwdev, dev_addr, size, dir);
}
/*
@@ -594,9 +594,9 @@ swiotlb_unmap_sg(struct device *hwdev, s
* The same as swiotlb_sync_single_* but for a scatter-gather list, same rules
* and usage.
*/
-void
-swiotlb_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
- int nelems, int dir)
+static inline void
+swiotlb_sync_sg(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
+ int nelems, int dir)
{
int i;
@@ -610,18 +610,17 @@ swiotlb_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct device *h
}
void
+swiotlb_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
+ int nelems, int dir)
+{
+ swiotlb_sync_sg(hwdev, sg, nelems, dir);
+}
+
+void
swiotlb_sync_sg_for_device(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
int nelems, int dir)
{
- int i;
-
- if (dir == DMA_NONE)
- BUG();
-
- for (i = 0; i < nelems; i++, sg++)
- if (sg->dma_address != SG_ENT_PHYS_ADDRESS(sg))
- sync_single(hwdev, (void *) sg->dma_address,
- sg->dma_length, dir);
+ swiotlb_sync_sg(hwdev, sg, nelems, dir);
}
int
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-12 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-30 18:03 [patch 2.6.13] swiotlb: add swiotlb_sync_single_range_for_{cpu,device} Luck, Tony
2005-08-30 18:09 ` John W. Linville
2005-08-30 18:33 ` [rfc patch] swiotlb: consolidate swiotlb_sync_single_* implementations John W. Linville
2005-08-30 18:40 ` [rfc patch] swiotlb: consolidate swiotlb_sync_sg_* implementations John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 0/6] swiotlb maintenance and x86_64 dma_sync_single_range_for_{cpu,device} John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 1/6] swiotlb: move from arch/ia64/lib to lib John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` John W. Linville [this message]
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 3/6] swiotlb: support syncing sub-ranges of mappings John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 4/6] swiotlb: support syncing DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL mappings John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 5/6] swiotlb: file header comments John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 6/6] x86_64: implement dma_sync_single_range_for_{cpu,device} John W. Linville
2005-09-12 15:22 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-12 18:51 ` [patch 2.6.13 4/6] swiotlb: support syncing DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL mappings Grant Grundler
2005-09-12 19:51 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-12 19:53 ` [patch 2.6.13] swiotlb: BUG() for DMA_NONE in sync_single John W. Linville
2005-09-12 20:23 ` Grant Grundler
2005-09-12 23:45 ` [patch 2.6.13 (take #2)] " John W. Linville
2005-09-12 23:59 ` Grant Grundler
2005-09-13 4:05 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=09122005104850.30992@bilbo.tuxdriver.com \
--to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=Asit.K.Mallick@intel.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox