public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
To: Pan Deng <pan.deng@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <tianyou.li@intel.com>,
	<tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
	<mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] sched/rt: Optimize cpupri_vec layout to mitigate cache line contention
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2026 18:16:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0920b6d2-73e0-4245-8806-e2cf08f74603@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24c460fb48d86a5b990acbb42d0d29d91dfc427c.1753076363.git.pan.deng@intel.com>

On 7/21/2025 2:10 PM, Pan Deng wrote:
> When running a multi-instance FFmpeg workload on an HCC system, significant
> cache line contention is observed around `cpupri_vec->count` and `mask` in
> struct root_domain.
> 
> The SUT is a 2-socket machine with 240 physical cores and 480 logical
> CPUs. 60 FFmpeg instances are launched, each pinned to 4 physical cores
> (8 logical CPUs) for transcoding tasks. Sub-threads use RT priority 99
> with FIFO scheduling. FPS is used as score.
> 

[ ... ]

> As a result:
> - FPS improves by ~11%
> - Kernel cycles% drops from ~20% to ~11%
> - `count` and `mask` related cache line contention is mitigated, perf c2c
>    shows root_domain cache line 3 `cycles per load` drops from ~10K-59K
>    to ~0.5K-8K, cpupri's last cache line no longer appears in the report.
> - stress-ng cyclic benchmark is improved ~31.4%, command:
>    stress-ng/stress-ng --cyclic $(nproc) --cyclic-policy fifo   \
>                        --timeout 30 --minimize --metrics
> - rt-tests/pi_stress is improved ~76.5%, command:
>    rt-tests/pi_stress -D 30 -g $(($(nproc) / 2))
> 

According to your test results above, this original proposal seems
simple enough. It provides a general benefit, not only for FFmpeg workloads
with "unusual" CPU affinity settings, but also for other common workloads
that do not use CPU affinity or partitioning.
I still prefer this proposal. Later we can rebase patch 4 on top of sbm
to see if it brings further improvements. patch 1 and patch 4 could form a
patch series IMHO.

thanks,
Chenyu

> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpupri.h b/kernel/sched/cpupri.h
> index d6cba0020064..245b0fa626be 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cpupri.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpupri.h
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
>   
>   struct cpupri_vec {
>   	atomic_t		count;
> -	cpumask_var_t		mask;
> +	cpumask_var_t		mask	____cacheline_aligned;
>   };
>   
>   struct cpupri {

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-08 10:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-21  6:10 [PATCH v2 0/4] sched/rt: mitigate root_domain cache line contention Pan Deng
2025-07-21  6:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] sched/rt: Optimize cpupri_vec layout to mitigate " Pan Deng
2026-03-20 10:09   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-24  9:36     ` Deng, Pan
2026-03-24 12:11       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-27 10:17         ` Deng, Pan
2026-04-02 10:37           ` Deng, Pan
2026-04-02 10:43           ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-08 10:16   ` Chen, Yu C [this message]
2026-04-09 11:47     ` Deng, Pan
2025-07-21  6:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] sched/rt: Restructure root_domain to reduce cacheline contention Pan Deng
2026-03-20 10:18   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-21  6:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] sched/rt: Split root_domain->rto_count to per-NUMA-node counters Pan Deng
2026-03-20 10:24   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-23 18:09     ` Tim Chen
2026-03-24 12:16       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-24 22:40         ` Tim Chen
2025-07-21  6:10 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] sched/rt: Split cpupri_vec->cpumask to per NUMA node to reduce contention Pan Deng
2026-03-20 12:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-23 18:45     ` Tim Chen
2026-03-24 12:00       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-31  5:37         ` Chen, Yu C
2026-03-31 10:19           ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-02  3:15             ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-02  4:41               ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-02 10:55                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-02 11:06                   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-03  5:46                     ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-03  8:13                       ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-07 20:35                       ` Tim Chen
2026-04-08  3:06                         ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-08 11:35                           ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-08 15:52                             ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-09  5:17                               ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-09 23:09                                 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-10  5:51                                   ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-10  6:02                                     ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-08  9:25                         ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-08 16:47                           ` Tim Chen
2026-03-20  9:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] sched/rt: mitigate root_domain cache line contention Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-20 12:50   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0920b6d2-73e0-4245-8806-e2cf08f74603@intel.com \
    --to=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=pan.deng@intel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tianyou.li@intel.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox