public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>
To: "David Gow" <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: dlatypov@google.com, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
	"Benjamin Berg" <benjamin.berg@intel.com>,
	"Brendan Higgins" <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>,
	"Nick Desaulniers" <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	"Rae Moar" <rmoar@google.com>,
	"Richard Fitzgerald" <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>,
	"Tom Rix" <trix@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/vc4: tests: Use KUNIT_DEFINE_ACTION_WRAPPER
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 14:53:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0977ffcd30973d0edc1ae4132216b094.mripard@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231128072410.952662-3-davidgow@google.com>

On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 15:24:07 +0800, David Gow wrote:
> In order to pass functions to kunit_add_action(), they need to be of the
> kunit_action_t type. While casting the function pointer can work, it
> will break control-flow integrity.
> 
> vc4_mock already defines such a wrapper for drm_dev_unregister(), but it
> 
> [ ... ]

Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>

Thanks!
Maxime

      reply	other threads:[~2023-11-28 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-28  7:24 [PATCH v2 1/3] kunit: Add a macro to wrap a deferred action function David Gow
2023-11-28  7:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/tests: Use KUNIT_DEFINE_ACTION_WRAPPER() David Gow
2023-11-28  7:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/vc4: tests: Use KUNIT_DEFINE_ACTION_WRAPPER David Gow
2023-11-28 14:53   ` Maxime Ripard [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0977ffcd30973d0edc1ae4132216b094.mripard@kernel.org \
    --to=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=benjamin.berg@intel.com \
    --cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=dlatypov@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=rf@opensource.cirrus.com \
    --cc=rmoar@google.com \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox