From: "Masayuki Ohtake" <masa-korg@dsn.okisemi.com>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "LKML" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Alan Cox" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
<andrew.chih.howe.khor@intel.com>,
"Intel OTC" <joel.clark@intel.com>,
"Wang, Qi" <qi.wang@intel.com>,
"Wang, Yong Y" <yong.y.wang@intel.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Packet hub driver of Topcliff PCH
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:25:03 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <09ac01cb2161$158c4650$66f8800a@maildom.okisemi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20100709130028.26174aa1.akpm@linux-foundation.org
Hi Andrew Morton
> The driver creates a character device /dev/pch_phub. That device file
> supports the following operations:
>
> read(): <document the read operation - seems to read a serial ROM?>
> write():<document the write operation - seems to write a serial ROM?>
> ioctl():<document the ioctl operation - seems to read/write a MAC address?>
We will add the above.
> I suspect this function will do strange things if passed an initial
> *ppos which is outside the range of the ROM. It looks like it will write
> a single byte into the ROM then will bale out.
>
>
> > + if (ret_value2) {
> > + err = ret_value2;
> > + goto return_err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (PCH_PHUB_OROM_SIZE < pos + addr_offset) {
>
> Is this off-by-one?
I understand OROM upper size check is not enough.
If the my understanding true, We will modify like below.
Can you accept the following our modification ?
+static ssize_t pch_phub_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
+ size_t size, loff_t *ppos)
+{
+ unsigned int data;
+ int ret_value1;
+ int ret_value2;
+ int err;
+ unsigned int addr_offset;
+ loff_t pos = *ppos;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&pch_phub_mutex);
+ if (ret) {
+ err = -ERESTARTSYS;
+ goto return_err_nomutex;
+ }
+
+ for (addr_offset = 0; addr_offset < size; addr_offset++) {
+ if (PCH_PHUB_OROM_SIZE < pos + addr_offset) {
+ *ppos += addr_offset;
+ goto return_ok;
+ }
+ ret_value1 = get_user(data, &buf[addr_offset]);
+ if (ret_value1) {
+ err = -EFAULT;
+ goto return_err;
+ }
+
+ ret_value2 = pch_phub_write_serial_rom(0x80 + addr_offset + pos,
+ data);
+ if (ret_value2) {
+ err = ret_value2;
+ goto return_err;
+ }
+
Thanks, Ohtake
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Masayuki Ohtak" <masa-korg@dsn.okisemi.com>
Cc: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>; "Wang, Yong Y" <yong.y.wang@intel.com>; <qi.wang@intel.com>;
<joel.clark@intel.com>; <andrew.chih.howe.khor@intel.com>; "Alan Cox" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>; "LKML"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2010 5:00 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Packet hub driver of Topcliff PCH
> On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 15:20:52 +0900
> Masayuki Ohtak <masa-korg@dsn.okisemi.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Arnd
> >
> > I have modified for your comments.
> > Please confirm below.
> >
> > Thanks, Ohtake.
> >
> > ---
> > Packet hub driver of Topcliff PCH
> >
> > Topcliff PCH is the platform controller hub that is going to be used in
> > Intel's upcoming general embedded platform. All IO peripherals in
> > Topcliff PCH are actually devices sitting on AMBA bus. Packet hub is
> > a special converter device in Topcliff PCH that translate AMBA transactions
> > to PCI Express transactions and vice versa. Thus packet hub helps present
> > all IO peripherals in Topcliff PCH as PCIE devices to IA system.
> > Topcliff PCH has MAC address and Option ROM data.
> > These data are in SROM which is connected to PCIE bus.
> > Packet hub driver of Topcliff PCH can access MAC address and Option ROM data in
> > SROM.
>
> That didn't describe the most important part of the driver: the
> userspace interface. We should add here something along the lines of
>
> The driver creates a character device /dev/pch_phub. That device file
> supports the following operations:
>
> read(): <document the read operation - seems to read a serial ROM?>
> write():<document the write operation - seems to write a serial ROM?>
> ioctl():<document the ioctl operation - seems to read/write a MAC address?>
>
> >
> > ...
> >
> > +static ssize_t pch_phub_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> > + size_t size, loff_t *ppos)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int data;
> > + int ret_value1;
> > + int ret_value2;
> > + int err;
> > + unsigned int addr_offset;
> > + loff_t pos = *ppos;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&pch_phub_mutex);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + err = -ERESTARTSYS;
> > + goto return_err_nomutex;
> > + }
> > +
> > + for (addr_offset = 0; addr_offset < size; addr_offset++) {
> > + ret_value1 = get_user(data, &buf[addr_offset]);
> > + if (ret_value1) {
> > + err = -EFAULT;
> > + goto return_err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret_value2 = pch_phub_write_serial_rom(0x80 + addr_offset + pos,
> > + data);
>
> I suspect this function will do strange things if passed an initial
> *ppos which is outside the range of the ROM. It looks like it will write
> a single byte into the ROM then will bale out.
>
>
> > + if (ret_value2) {
> > + err = ret_value2;
> > + goto return_err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (PCH_PHUB_OROM_SIZE < pos + addr_offset) {
>
> Is this off-by-one?
>
> > + *ppos += addr_offset;
> > + goto return_ok;
> > + }
> > +
> > + }
> > +
> > + *ppos += addr_offset;
> > +
> > +return_ok:
> > + mutex_unlock(&pch_phub_mutex);
> > + return addr_offset;
> > +
> > +return_err:
> > + mutex_unlock(&pch_phub_mutex);
> > +return_err_nomutex:
> > + return err;
> > +}
> >
> > ...
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-12 1:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-22 5:33 [PATCH] Topcliff PHUB: Generate PacketHub driver Masayuki Ohtak
2010-06-22 10:33 ` Masayuki Ohtak
2010-06-22 22:12 ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-23 0:31 ` Masayuki Ohtake
2010-06-22 11:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-06-22 13:52 ` Yong Wang
2010-06-29 23:31 ` Andy Isaacson
2010-06-30 5:58 ` Masayuki Ohtake
2010-06-30 18:28 ` Andy Isaacson
2010-07-01 4:08 ` Masayuki Ohtake
2010-06-30 7:51 ` [PATCH] Packet hub driver of Topcliff PCH Masayuki Ohtak
2010-06-30 18:05 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-07-01 2:52 ` Masayuki Ohtake
2010-07-01 5:14 ` Masayuki Ohtak
2010-07-01 6:58 ` Andy Isaacson
2010-07-01 10:13 ` Masayuki Ohtake
2010-07-01 10:38 ` Masayuki Ohtak
2010-07-01 15:44 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-07-05 7:20 ` Masayuki Ohtak
2010-07-05 15:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-06 15:58 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-07-06 6:20 ` Masayuki Ohtak
2010-07-06 6:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-07 1:19 ` Yong Wang
2010-07-09 20:00 ` Andrew Morton
2010-07-12 1:25 ` Masayuki Ohtake [this message]
2010-07-15 7:25 ` Masayuki Ohtak
2010-07-15 7:42 ` [PATCH] I2C " Masayuki Ohtak
2010-07-15 19:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-20 0:05 ` Masayuki Ohtake
2010-07-20 4:55 ` Masayuki Ohtake
2010-07-20 9:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-20 12:38 ` Masayuki Ohtake
2010-07-20 8:19 ` Masayuki Ohtake
2010-07-20 9:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-20 12:40 ` Masayuki Ohtake
2010-07-21 6:46 ` Masayuki Ohtak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='09ac01cb2161$158c4650$66f8800a@maildom.okisemi.com' \
--to=masa-korg@dsn.okisemi.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=andrew.chih.howe.khor@intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=joel.clark@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qi.wang@intel.com \
--cc=yong.y.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox