From: "Adam Kropelin" <akropel1@rochester.rr.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "Auke Kok" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>,
"Adrian Bunk" <bunk@stusta.de>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<jgarzik@pobox.com>, <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"Allen Parker" <parker@isohunt.com>, <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
<gregkh@suse.de>, <linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc7: known regressions (v2) (part 1)
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 23:44:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <09ba01c74817$1ae12980$84163e05@kroptech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m1ps8qzpte.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Adam Kropelin" <akropel1@rochester.rr.com> writes:
>
>>> Can I get the corresponding lspci -xxx output. I suspect the BIOS
>>> did not program the hypertransport MSI mapping capabilities
>>> correctly. All it has to do is set the enable but still,
>>> occasionally BIOS writers miss the most amazing things.
>>
>> Here you go. This is from 2.6.20-rc7.
>
> Thanks. Conclusion. I could not find bit 16 (the enable bit) set in
> any of your hypertransport msi mapping capabilities.
>
> So MSI interrupts won't work until someone enables your chipset
> to transform them into hypertransport interrupts.
Naive question... Can the pci layer (or e1000) detect that MSI is not
enabled in the hardware and avoid using it in that case? With the number
of MSI problems showing up it seems risky to assume it's usable on any
given platform without some sort of sanity check.
--Adam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-04 4:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-31 4:28 Linux 2.6.20-rc7 Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <45C05150.6000802@agmk.net>
2007-01-31 16:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-31 23:13 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <200702010037.48472.pluto@agmk.net>
2007-02-01 0:14 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-01 0:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-01 0:26 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-01 0:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-01 0:44 ` Nick Piggin
2007-02-01 0:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-01 6:48 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-01-31 17:11 ` [PATCH] x86_64: Fix preprocessor condition Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
2007-01-31 17:16 ` Andi Kleen
2007-01-31 17:40 ` Josef Sipek
2007-01-31 18:15 ` Linux 2.6.20-rc7 Sunil Naidu
2007-02-01 2:16 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2007-02-01 2:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-01 3:01 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2007-02-01 3:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-01 5:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-02-01 6:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-01 6:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-02-01 6:38 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2007-02-01 6:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-02-02 20:52 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2007-02-01 21:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-02-02 5:49 ` 2.6.20-rc7: known regressions Adrian Bunk
2007-02-03 1:55 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-03 2:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-02-03 2:15 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-03 9:19 ` Frédéric Riss
2007-02-03 9:24 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-03 9:33 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-03 9:49 ` Frédéric Riss
2007-02-03 9:58 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-03 10:47 ` Frédéric Riss
2007-02-03 10:51 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-03 10:57 ` Frédéric Riss
2007-02-03 11:08 ` Frédéric RISS
2007-02-04 13:13 ` Frédéric Riss
2007-02-04 14:37 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-04 17:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-04 18:18 ` Frédéric Riss
2007-02-04 18:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-05 8:26 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-05 9:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-03 0:44 ` 2.6.20-rc7: known regressions (v2) (part 1) Adrian Bunk
2007-02-03 6:06 ` Auke Kok
2007-02-03 7:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-03 18:06 ` Adam Kropelin
2007-02-03 20:43 ` Auke Kok
2007-02-03 21:00 ` Adam Kropelin
2007-02-03 21:26 ` Auke Kok
2007-02-03 22:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-03 21:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-03 23:20 ` Adam Kropelin
2007-02-04 1:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-04 4:44 ` Adam Kropelin [this message]
2007-02-04 5:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-03 0:47 ` 2.6.20-rc7: known regressions (v2) (part 2) Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='09ba01c74817$1ae12980$84163e05@kroptech.com' \
--to=akropel1@rochester.rr.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=parker@isohunt.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox