From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
arm-mail-list <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com, leobras.c@gmail.com,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] rockpro64: PCI BAR reassignment broken by commit 9d57e61bf723 ("of/pci: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 to resource flags for 64-bit memory addresses")
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 14:28:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <09cbf655-0f13-5df6-b6a9-4a6a784e211d@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7a1e2ebc-f7d8-8431-d844-41a9c36a8911@arm.com>
On 2021/5/18 下午5:09, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> After doing a git bisect I was able to trace the following error when booting my
> rockpro64 v2 (rk3399 SoC) with a PCIE NVME expansion card:
I'm also hitting the same problem, with a RockPi 4B board.
[...]
> [ 0.393269] pci_bus 0000:01: busn_res: [bus 01-1f] end is updated to 01
> [ 0.393311] pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 14: no space for [mem size 0x00100000]
> [ 0.393333] pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 14: failed to assign [mem size 0x00100000]
> [ 0.393356] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: no space for [mem size 0x00004000 64bit]
> [ 0.393375] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: failed to assign [mem size 0x00004000 64bit]
The same error here.
> [ 0.393397] pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
> [ 0.393839] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: PME: Signaling with IRQ 78
> [ 0.394165] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: AER: enabled with IRQ 78
> [..]
>
> to the commit 9d57e61bf723 ("of/pci: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 to resource flags for
> 64-bit memory addresses"). For reference, here is the dmesg output when BAR
> reassignment works:
Great thanks for the pinning down the bug, at least I can try to boot my
board again with the patch reverted.
Thanks,
Qu
>
> [..]
> [ 0.307381] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: host bridge /pcie@f8000000 ranges:
> [ 0.307445] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: MEM 0x00fa000000..0x00fbdfffff ->
> 0x00fa000000
> [ 0.307481] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: IO 0x00fbe00000..0x00fbefffff ->
> 0x00fbe00000
> [ 0.308406] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: supply vpcie1v8 not found, using dummy
> regulator
> [ 0.308534] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: supply vpcie0v9 not found, using dummy
> regulator
> [ 0.374676] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
> [ 0.374701] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-1f]
> [ 0.374723] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xfa000000-0xfbdfffff]
> [ 0.374746] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io 0x0000-0xfffff] (bus
> address [0xfbe00000-0xfbefffff])
> [ 0.374808] pci 0000:00:00.0: [1d87:0100] type 01 class 0x060400
> [ 0.374943] pci 0000:00:00.0: supports D1
> [ 0.374961] pci 0000:00:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D1 D3hot
> [ 0.379473] pci 0000:00:00.0: bridge configuration invalid ([bus 00-00]),
> reconfiguring
> [ 0.379712] pci 0000:01:00.0: [144d:a808] type 00 class 0x010802
> [ 0.379815] pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x00000000-0x00003fff 64bit]
> [ 0.379997] pci 0000:01:00.0: Max Payload Size set to 256 (was 128, max 256)
> [ 0.380607] pci 0000:01:00.0: 8.000 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth, limited by
> 2.5 GT/s PCIe x4 link at 0000:00:00.0 (capable of 31.504 Gb/s with 8.0 GT/s PCIe
> x4 link)
> [ 0.394239] pci_bus 0000:01: busn_res: [bus 01-1f] end is updated to 01
> [ 0.394285] pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 14: assigned [mem 0xfa000000-0xfa0fffff]
> [ 0.394312] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0xfa000000-0xfa003fff 64bit]
> [ 0.394374] pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
> [ 0.394395] pci 0000:00:00.0: bridge window [mem 0xfa000000-0xfa0fffff]
> [ 0.394569] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
> [ 0.394845] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: PME: Signaling with IRQ 78
> [ 0.395153] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: AER: enabled with IRQ 78
> [..]
>
> And here is the output of lspci when BAR reassignment works:
>
> # lspci -v
> 00:00.0 PCI bridge: Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd RK3399 PCI Express Root
> Port (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
> Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 78
> Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=0
> I/O behind bridge: 00000000-00000fff [size=4K]
> Memory behind bridge: fa000000-fa0fffff [size=1M]
> Prefetchable memory behind bridge: 00000000-000fffff [size=1M]
> Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 3
> Capabilities: [90] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable+ 64bit+
> Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable- Count=1 Masked-
> Capabilities: [c0] Express Root Port (Slot+), MSI 00
> Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting
> Capabilities: [274] Transaction Processing Hints
> Kernel driver in use: pcieport
> lspci: Unable to load libkmod resources: error -2
>
> 01:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd NVMe SSD
> Controller SM981/PM981/PM983 (prog-if 02 [NVM Express])
> Subsystem: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd NVMe SSD Controller SM981/PM981/PM983
> Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 77, NUMA node 0
> Memory at fa000000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
> Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 3
> Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
> Capabilities: [70] Express Endpoint, MSI 00
> Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable+ Count=33 Masked-
> Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting
> Capabilities: [148] Device Serial Number 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
> Capabilities: [158] Power Budgeting <?>
> Capabilities: [168] Secondary PCI Express
> Capabilities: [188] Latency Tolerance Reporting
> Capabilities: [190] L1 PM Substates
> Kernel driver in use: nvme
>
> I can provide more information if needed (the board is sitting on my desk) and I
> can help with testing the fix.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-19 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-18 9:09 [BUG] rockpro64: PCI BAR reassignment broken by commit 9d57e61bf723 ("of/pci: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 to resource flags for 64-bit memory addresses") Alexandru Elisei
2021-05-19 6:28 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2021-05-19 7:05 ` Qu Wenruo
2021-05-19 9:20 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-05-19 11:16 ` Qu Wenruo
2021-05-19 11:27 ` Robin Murphy
2021-05-19 13:17 ` Peter Geis
2021-05-23 11:03 ` Punit Agrawal
2021-05-23 12:10 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-25 13:42 ` Punit Agrawal
2021-05-25 13:54 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-25 15:34 ` Peter Geis
2021-05-25 15:54 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-25 16:23 ` Peter Geis
2021-05-25 16:44 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-25 17:01 ` Peter Geis
2021-05-25 17:18 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-25 17:37 ` Peter Geis
2021-05-26 13:55 ` Christian König
2021-05-26 14:15 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-25 17:25 ` Robin Murphy
2021-05-25 17:34 ` Peter Geis
2021-05-25 18:55 ` Robin Murphy
2021-05-25 19:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-05-25 19:43 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-25 20:03 ` Peter Geis
2021-05-26 14:18 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-25 16:59 ` Anand Moon
2021-05-25 17:14 ` Robin Murphy
2021-05-25 17:42 ` Peter Geis
2021-05-25 22:36 ` Punit Agrawal
2021-05-26 15:37 ` Rob Herring
2021-05-26 16:35 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=09cbf655-0f13-5df6-b6a9-4a6a784e211d@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com \
--cc=leobras.c@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox