public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.com>,
	Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/10] iommu/vt-d: Add custom allocator for IOASID
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:21:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a0f33b8-e3d8-3d29-ca71-552f1875bc62@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191023005129.GC100970@otc-nc-03>

Hi,

On 10/23/19 8:51 AM, Raj, Ashok wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 04:53:15PM -0700, Jacob Pan wrote:
>> When VT-d driver runs in the guest, PASID allocation must be
>> performed via virtual command interface. This patch registers a
>> custom IOASID allocator which takes precedence over the default
>> XArray based allocator. The resulting IOASID allocation will always
>> come from the host. This ensures that PASID namespace is system-
>> wide.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/iommu/Kconfig       |  1 +
>>   drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   include/linux/intel-iommu.h |  2 ++
>>   3 files changed, 70 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
>> index fd50ddffffbf..961fe5795a90 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
>> @@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ config INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
>>   	bool "Support for Shared Virtual Memory with Intel IOMMU"
>>   	depends on INTEL_IOMMU && X86
>>   	select PCI_PASID
>> +	select IOASID
>>   	select MMU_NOTIFIER
>>   	help
>>   	  Shared Virtual Memory (SVM) provides a facility for devices
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> index 3f974919d3bd..3aff0141c522 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> @@ -1706,6 +1706,8 @@ static void free_dmar_iommu(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>>   		if (ecap_prs(iommu->ecap))
>>   			intel_svm_finish_prq(iommu);
>>   	}
>> +	ioasid_unregister_allocator(&iommu->pasid_allocator);
>> +
>>   #endif
>>   }
>>   
>> @@ -4910,6 +4912,46 @@ static int __init probe_acpi_namespace_devices(void)
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
> 
> Maybe move them to intel-svm.c instead? that's where the bulk
> of the svm support is?

I think this is a generic PASID allocator for guest IOMMU although vSVA
is currently the only consumer. Instead of making it SVM specific, I'd
like to suggest moving it to intel-pasid.c and replace the @svm
parameter with a void * one in intel_ioasid_free().

> 
>> +static ioasid_t intel_ioasid_alloc(ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max, void *data)
>> +{
>> +	struct intel_iommu *iommu = data;
>> +	ioasid_t ioasid;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * VT-d virtual command interface always uses the full 20 bit
>> +	 * PASID range. Host can partition guest PASID range based on
>> +	 * policies but it is out of guest's control.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (min < PASID_MIN || max > PASID_MAX)
>> +		return INVALID_IOASID;
> 
> What are these PASID_MIN/MAX? Do you check if these are within the
> limits supported by the iommu/vIOMMU as its enumerated?
> 

Is it an invalid request when @max is greater than hardware capability?

Say, the consumer is asking for allocate a PASID within [0, 2^20], while
the PASID pool of the allocator is just, say, [4, 2^19] with others
reserved for other special usage or due to iommu capability. Instead
of returning error, why not just allocating a PASID within [2, 2^19]?

In another word, final allocation range should be Range[allocator 
supported] & Range[customer specified]. Please correct me if I missed
anything.

> 
>> +
>> +	if (vcmd_alloc_pasid(iommu, &ioasid))
>> +		return INVALID_IOASID;
>> +
>> +	return ioasid;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void intel_ioasid_free(ioasid_t ioasid, void *data)
>> +{
>> +	struct iommu_pasid_alloc_info *svm;
>> +	struct intel_iommu *iommu = data;
>> +
>> +	if (!iommu)
>> +		return;
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Sanity check the ioasid owner is done at upper layer, e.g. VFIO
>> +	 * We can only free the PASID when all the devices are unbond.
>> +	 */
>> +	svm = ioasid_find(NULL, ioasid, NULL);
>> +	if (!svm) {
>> +		pr_warn("Freeing unbond IOASID %d\n", ioasid);
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +	vcmd_free_pasid(iommu, ioasid);
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>>   int __init intel_iommu_init(void)
>>   {
>>   	int ret = -ENODEV;
>> @@ -5020,6 +5062,31 @@ int __init intel_iommu_init(void)
>>   				       "%s", iommu->name);
>>   		iommu_device_set_ops(&iommu->iommu, &intel_iommu_ops);
>>   		iommu_device_register(&iommu->iommu);
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
>> +		if (cap_caching_mode(iommu->cap) && sm_supported(iommu)) {
> 
> do you need to check against cap_caching_mode() or ecap_vcmd?
> 
> 
>> +			/*
>> +			 * Register a custom ASID allocator if we are running
>> +			 * in a guest, the purpose is to have a system wide PASID
>> +			 * namespace among all PASID users.
>> +			 * There can be multiple vIOMMUs in each guest but only
>> +			 * one allocator is active. All vIOMMU allocators will
>> +			 * eventually be calling the same host allocator.
>> +			 */
>> +			iommu->pasid_allocator.alloc = intel_ioasid_alloc;
>> +			iommu->pasid_allocator.free = intel_ioasid_free;
>> +			iommu->pasid_allocator.pdata = (void *)iommu;
>> +			ret = ioasid_register_allocator(&iommu->pasid_allocator);
>> +			if (ret) {
>> +				pr_warn("Custom PASID allocator registeration failed\n");
>> +				/*
>> +				 * Disable scalable mode on this IOMMU if there
>> +				 * is no custom allocator. Mixing SM capable vIOMMU
>> +				 * and non-SM vIOMMU are not supported.
>> +				 */
>> +				intel_iommu_sm = 0;
>> +			}
>> +		}
>> +#endif

I think this should also be moved to intel-pasid.c and made it svm
independent as a generic pasid allocator for IOMMU running in a vm guest
or user level application.

Best regards,
baolu

>>   	}
>>   
>>   	bus_set_iommu(&pci_bus_type, &intel_iommu_ops);
>> diff --git a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
>> index eea7468694a7..fb1973a761c1 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/iommu.h>
>>   #include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h>
>>   #include <linux/dmar.h>
>> +#include <linux/ioasid.h>
>>   
>>   #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>>   #include <asm/iommu.h>
>> @@ -542,6 +543,7 @@ struct intel_iommu {
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
>>   	struct page_req_dsc *prq;
>>   	unsigned char prq_name[16];    /* Name for PRQ interrupt */
>> +	struct ioasid_allocator_ops pasid_allocator; /* Custom allocator for PASIDs */
>>   #endif
>>   	struct q_inval  *qi;            /* Queued invalidation info */
>>   	u32 *iommu_state; /* Store iommu states between suspend and resume.*/
>> -- 
>> 2.7.4
>>
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-23  2:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-22 23:53 [PATCH v6 00/10] Nested Shared Virtual Address (SVA) VT-d support Jacob Pan
2019-10-22 23:53 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] iommu/vt-d: Enlightened PASID allocation Jacob Pan
2019-10-23  0:45   ` Raj, Ashok
2019-10-23  1:53     ` Lu Baolu
2019-10-23 17:55       ` Jacob Pan
2019-10-23 21:11         ` Jacob Pan
2019-10-25  1:42           ` Lu Baolu
2019-10-25  1:39         ` Lu Baolu
2019-10-22 23:53 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] iommu/vt-d: Add custom allocator for IOASID Jacob Pan
2019-10-23  0:51   ` Raj, Ashok
2019-10-23  2:21     ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2019-10-23 23:01       ` Jacob Pan
2019-10-25  1:44         ` Lu Baolu
2019-10-23  4:04     ` Jacob Pan
2019-10-23 23:04       ` Jacob Pan
2019-10-22 23:53 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] iommu/vt-d: Replace Intel specific PASID allocator with IOASID Jacob Pan
2019-10-23  0:58   ` Raj, Ashok
2019-10-23  4:19     ` Jacob Pan
2019-10-22 23:53 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] iommu/vt-d: Move domain helper to header Jacob Pan
2019-10-22 23:53 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] iommu/vt-d: Avoid duplicated code for PASID setup Jacob Pan
2019-10-22 23:53 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] iommu/vt-d: Add nested translation helper function Jacob Pan
2019-10-22 23:53 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] iommu/vt-d: Misc macro clean up for SVM Jacob Pan
2019-10-22 23:53 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] iommu/vt-d: Add bind guest PASID support Jacob Pan
2019-10-22 23:53 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] iommu/vt-d: Support flushing more translation cache types Jacob Pan
2019-10-22 23:53 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] iommu/vt-d: Add svm/sva invalidate function Jacob Pan
2019-10-23  0:27 ` [PATCH v6 00/10] Nested Shared Virtual Address (SVA) VT-d support Raj, Ashok
2019-10-23 13:46   ` Jacob Pan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0a0f33b8-e3d8-3d29-ca71-552f1875bc62@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox