public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jdow" <jdow@earthlink.net>
To: "Davide Libenzi" <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: "Xuan Baldauf" <xuan--lkml@baldauf.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Heuristic readahead for filesystems
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 10:51:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0b3101c259bb$df4458f0$1125a8c0@wednesday> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.LNX.4.44.0209111011330.1576-100000@blue1.dev.mcafeelabs.com

From: "Davide Libenzi" <davidel@xmailserver.org>

> On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, jdow wrote:
>
> > Davide, when was the patent on readahead taken out? It has either
expired
> > or I can prove prior art I did myself on the old StarDrive and HardFrame
> > controllers for the Amiga made by Microbotics, Inc.
>
> I'm definitely not a patent attorney :) but since there's the tendency to
> patent almost everything in big corporations ( my Co. gives $ 2K for each
> patent filed, plus another $ 1K if it's approved ) I bet that there's a
> patent pending somewhere about this. Even if someone have prior art about
> hw prefecting, imho there's the possibility to patent a software ( kernel
> ) based version of the art. I also do not think M$ to be so dumb to adopt
> a technique that is described inside a someone else owned patent in US.
> But again, i'm not a patent attorney ...

This was kernel software. It was committed in the mid 80s. (Hm, so a patent
MIGHT not be expired by a year or two.) The predecessor device was used to
overturn a patent a company claimed on parallel port to SCSI converters. The
Microbotics units were rather forward looking for their day.

{^_^}    Joanne Dow, jdow@earthlink.net



  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-11 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-11 15:42 Heuristic readahead for filesystems Xuan Baldauf
2002-09-11 16:33 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-09-11 17:03   ` jdow
2002-09-11 17:20     ` Davide Libenzi
2002-09-11 17:51       ` jdow [this message]
2002-09-11 17:16   ` Hans Reiser
2002-09-11 16:42 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-11 17:20   ` Oliver Neukum
2002-09-11 17:56   ` Xuan Baldauf
2002-09-11 18:30     ` Oliver Neukum
2002-09-11 18:43       ` Xuan Baldauf
2002-09-11 19:04         ` Oliver Neukum
2002-09-11 19:21           ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-09-12  0:45             ` jw schultz
2002-09-12  1:58               ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-12 11:41               ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-09-12 13:35                 ` jw schultz
2002-09-12 21:33                 ` jdow
2002-09-16 12:52                   ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-09-17  1:45                     ` jdow
2002-09-17 10:37                       ` jbradford
2002-09-17  5:19                     ` jdow
2002-09-12 12:41               ` Jesse Pollard
2002-09-11 19:03   ` Tomas Szepe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='0b3101c259bb$df4458f0$1125a8c0@wednesday' \
    --to=jdow@earthlink.net \
    --cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xuan--lkml@baldauf.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox