Re: [PATCH v6 23/42] x86/resctrl: Add resctrl_arch_ prefix to pseudo lock functions

[James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>]

Hi Reinette,

On 20/02/2025 00:53, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> On 2/7/25 10:18 AM, James Morse wrote:
>> resctrl's pseudo lock has some copy-to-cache and measurement
>> functions that are micro-architecture specific.
>>
>> For example, pseudo_lock_fn() is not at all portable.
>>
>> Label these 'resctrl_arch_' so they stay under /arch/x86.
>> To expose these functions to the filesystem code they need an entry
>> in a header file, and can't be marked static.

>> -static int measure_l3_residency(void *_plr)
>> +int resctrl_arch_measure_l3_residency(void *_plr)
>>  {
>>  	struct pseudo_lock_region *plr = _plr;
>>  	struct residency_counts counts = {0};
>> @@ -1205,14 +1207,14 @@ static int pseudo_lock_measure_cycles(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, int sel)
>>  	plr->cpu = cpu;
>>  
>>  	if (sel == 1)
>> -		thread = kthread_run_on_cpu(measure_cycles_lat_fn, plr,
>> -					    cpu, "pseudo_lock_measure/%u");
>> +		thread = kthread_run_on_cpu(resctrl_arch_measure_cycles_lat_fn,
>> +					     plr, cpu, "pseudo_lock_measure/%u");
> 
> checkpatch.pl does not like this extra space that sneaked in.

Looks like I missed the step to re-check that after the rebase.


> With spacing fixed:
> | Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>


Thanks!

James