From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Charlie Jenkins' <charlie@rivosinc.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 2/2] lib: checksum: Use aligned accesses for ip_fast_csum and csum_ipv6_magic tests
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 09:54:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0b78e69bf4ef4e52a61ffe21d2c08c96@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZcQeyigDWwvnc4Nu@ghost>
From: Charlie Jenkins
> Sent: 08 February 2024 00:23
>
> On Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 09:41:56AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 11:10:04AM -0800, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> > > The test cases for ip_fast_csum and csum_ipv6_magic were using arbitrary
> > > alignment of data to iterate through random inputs. ip_fast_csum should
> > > have the data aligned along (14 + NET_IP_ALIGN) bytes and
> > > csum_ipv6_magic should have data aligned along 32-bit boundaries.
> > >
> > >
...
> >
> > So this works on little endian systems. Unfortunately, I still get
> >
...
> >
> > when running the test on big endian systems such as hppa/parisc or sparc.
>
> Hmm okay it was easy to get this to work on big endian for
> test_ip_fast_csum but test_csum_ipv6_magic was trickier. I will send out
> a new version with the changes.
Instead of trying to save the expected results why not just
calculate them with a 'really dumb' implementation.
(eg: Add 16bit items and then fold.)
For the generic tests, IIRC:
Your test vectors looked random.
They should probably contain some very specific tests cases.
eg:
- Zero length and all zeros - checksum should be zero (not 0xffff).
- Buffers where the final 'fold' needs the carry added in.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-08 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-30 19:10 [PATCH v5 0/2] lib: checksum: Fix issues with checksum tests Charlie Jenkins
2024-01-30 19:10 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] lib: checksum: Fix type casting in checksum kunits Charlie Jenkins
2024-01-30 19:10 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] lib: checksum: Use aligned accesses for ip_fast_csum and csum_ipv6_magic tests Charlie Jenkins
2024-02-04 17:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-02-08 0:22 ` Charlie Jenkins
2024-02-08 9:54 ` David Laight [this message]
2024-02-08 20:09 ` Charlie Jenkins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0b78e69bf4ef4e52a61ffe21d2c08c96@AcuMS.aculab.com \
--to=david.laight@aculab.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=charlie@rivosinc.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox