Re: [patch 4/4] jump_label: Simplify and clarify static_key_fast_inc_cpus_locked()

[Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>]

> Make the code more obvious and add proper comments to avoid future head
> scratching.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> ---
>   kernel/jump_label.c |   20 +++++++++++---------
>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/kernel/jump_label.c
> +++ b/kernel/jump_label.c
> @@ -162,22 +162,24 @@ bool static_key_slow_inc_cpuslocked(stru
>   	if (static_key_fast_inc_not_disabled(key))
>   		return true;
>   
> -	jump_label_lock();
> -	if (atomic_read(&key->enabled) == 0) {
> -		atomic_set(&key->enabled, -1);
> +	guard(mutex)(&jump_label_mutex);
> +	/* Try to mark it as 'enabling in progress. */

Missing closing quotation mark above.

> +	if (!atomic_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, 0, -1)) {

This can be:

int tmp = 0;
if (atomic_try_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, &tmp, -1)) {
...

and will result in more optimal code and will IMO also be more readable 
because it is clear that the code is executed when cmpxchg succeeds.

(BTW: The atomic_read()/atomic_set() pair can also be converted to 
cmpxchg in static_key_enable_cpuslocked().)

Uros.