Re: [RESEND][PATCH v8 0/7] Preparatory changes for Proxy Execution v8

[K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>]

Hello John,

On 2/28/2024 10:21 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 8:43 PM 'K Prateek Nayak' via kernel-team
> <kernel-team@android.com> wrote:
>> Happy to report that I did not see any regressions with the series
>> as expected. Full results below.
>>
> [snip]
>> o System Details
>>
>> - 3rd Generation EPYC System
>> - 2 x 64C/128T
>> - NPS1 mode
>>
>> o Kernels
>>
>> tip:            tip:sched/core at commit 8cec3dd9e593 ("sched/core:
>>                 Simplify code by removing duplicate #ifdefs")
>>
>> proxy-setup:    tip + this series
>>
> 
> Hey! Thank you so much for taking the time to run these through the
> testing! I *really* appreciate it!
> 
> Just to clarify: by "this series" did you test just the 7 preparatory
> patches submitted to the list here, or did you pull the full
> proxy-exec-v8-6.8-rc3 set from git?

Just these preparatory patches for now. On my way to queue a run for the
whole set from your tree. I'll use the "proxy-exec-v8-6.8-rc3" branch and
pick the commits past the
"[ANNOTATION] === Proxy Exec patches past this point ===" till the commit
ff90fb583a81 ("FIX: Avoid using possibly uninitialized cpu value with
activate_blocked_entities()") on top of the tip:sched/core mentioned
above since it'll allow me to reuse the baseline numbers :)

> (Either is great! I just wanted to make sure its clear which were covered)
> 
> [snip]
>> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> 
> Thanks so much again!
> -john

--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek