From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>, Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tests: Add auto counter reload (ACR) sampling test
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 17:19:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0ce093d8-3647-4879-9d65-acd52d4c0ab0@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fW0Z0zXDjqR_tpJbT-0nbyXQO-Zcc+4Fpk=XejYX8uF4g@mail.gmail.com>
On 4/13/2026 9:30 AM, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2026 at 6:14 PM Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> Add auto counter reload sampling test to verify that the intended event
>> records can be captured and the self-reloaded events won't generate any
>> records.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
>> index 7cb81cf3444a..1068843282f5 100755
>> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
>> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
>> @@ -402,6 +402,47 @@ test_callgraph() {
>> echo "Callgraph test [Success]"
>> }
>>
>> +test_acr_sampling() {
>> + events="{instructions/period=20000,acr_mask=0x2/u,cycles/period=40000,acr_mask=0x3/u}"
>> + pebs_events="{instructions/period=20000,acr_mask=0x2/pu,cycles/period=40000,acr_mask=0x3/u}"
>> + echo "Auto counter reload sampling test"
>> + if ! perf record -o "${perfdata}" -e "${events}" ${testprog} 2> /dev/null
>> + then
>> + echo "Auto counter reload sampling [Skipped not supported]"
>> + return
>> + fi
>> + if ! perf script -i "${perfdata}" | grep -q "period=20000,acr_mask=0x2"
>> + then
>> + echo "Auto counter reload sampling [Failed missing instructions event]"
>> + err=1
>> + return
>> + fi
>> + if perf script -i "${perfdata}" | grep -q "period=40000,acr_mask=0x3"
>> + then
>> + echo "Auto counter reload sampling [Failed cycles event shouldn't be sampled]"
>> + err=1
>> + return
>> + fi
>> + if ! perf record -o "${perfdata}" -e "${pebs_events}" ${testprog} 2> /dev/null
>> + then
>> + echo "Auto counter reload PEBS sampling [Skipped not supported]"
>> + return
>> + fi
>> + if ! perf script -i "${perfdata}" | grep -q "period=20000,acr_mask=0x2"
>> + then
>> + echo "Auto counter reload PEBS sampling [Failed missing instructions event]"
>> + err=1
>> + return
>> + fi
>> + if perf script -i "${perfdata}" | grep -q "period=40000,acr_mask=0x3"
>> + then
>> + echo "Auto counter reload PEBS sampling [Failed cycles event shouldn't be sampled]"
>> + err=1
>> + return
>> + fi
>> + echo "Auto counter reload sampling [Success]"
> Thanks Dapeng! Could we also test ratio-to-prev as well as just the
> plain acr_mask?
Ian, it could be hard to validate ratio-to-prev option in this test. On
platforms which don't support ACR, perf would automatically fallback the
ACR sampling to normal sampling, this would lead to false positives on
checking the existence of records from cycles event. I didn't find a good
way to figure out this fallback.
Since we already have independent test case to validate the ratio_to_prev
parsing. It may be unnecessary to add ratio-to-prev validation in this ACR
test.
>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
>> +}
>> +
>> test_ratio_to_prev() {
>> echo "ratio-to-prev test"
>> if ! perf record -o /dev/null -e "{instructions, cycles/period=100000,ratio-to-prev=0.5/}" \
>> @@ -457,6 +498,7 @@ test_leader_sampling
>> test_topdown_leader_sampling
>> test_precise_max
>> test_callgraph
>> +test_acr_sampling
>> test_ratio_to_prev
>>
>> # restore the default value
>>
>> base-commit: 4e03d6494f9504f8af46ba68a2a8b6877c196789
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-15 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-13 1:09 [PATCH] perf tests: Add auto counter reload (ACR) sampling test Dapeng Mi
2026-04-13 1:30 ` Ian Rogers
2026-04-13 1:35 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-04-15 9:19 ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
2026-04-15 17:13 ` Ian Rogers
2026-04-16 3:06 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-04-16 3:17 ` Ian Rogers
2026-04-16 3:25 ` Mi, Dapeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0ce093d8-3647-4879-9d65-acd52d4c0ab0@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox