From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] perf counts: Reset prev_raw_counts counts
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 10:45:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d7cbbb0-9c35-c6c8-839b-2f12d6ed2808@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200507151932.GF2804092@krava>
Hi Jiri,
On 5/7/2020 11:19 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 02:58:20PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
>> The evsel->prev_raw_counts is updated in perf_evsel__compute_deltas:
>>
>> perf_evsel__compute_deltas()
>> {
>> tmp = *perf_counts(evsel->prev_raw_counts, cpu, thread);
>> *perf_counts(evsel->prev_raw_counts, cpu, thread) = *count;
>> }
>>
>> When we want to reset the evsel->prev_raw_counts in
>> perf_evsel__reset_prev_raw_counts, zeroing the aggr is not enough,
>> we need to reset the counts too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/util/counts.c | 5 +++++
>> tools/perf/util/counts.h | 2 ++
>> tools/perf/util/stat.c | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/counts.c b/tools/perf/util/counts.c
>> index f94e1a23dad6..af3bf36f7c63 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/counts.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/counts.c
>> @@ -64,3 +64,8 @@ void perf_evsel__free_counts(struct evsel *evsel)
>> perf_counts__delete(evsel->counts);
>> evsel->counts = NULL;
>> }
>> +
>> +void perf_evsel__reset_raw_counts(struct evsel *evsel)
>> +{
>> + perf_counts__reset(evsel->prev_raw_counts);
>> +}
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/counts.h b/tools/perf/util/counts.h
>> index 92196df4945f..15bb9acb7cb0 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/counts.h
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/counts.h
>> @@ -42,4 +42,6 @@ void perf_evsel__reset_counts(struct evsel *evsel);
>> int perf_evsel__alloc_counts(struct evsel *evsel, int ncpus, int nthreads);
>> void perf_evsel__free_counts(struct evsel *evsel);
>>
>> +void perf_evsel__reset_raw_counts(struct evsel *evsel);
>> +
>> #endif /* __PERF_COUNTS_H */
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/stat.c b/tools/perf/util/stat.c
>> index 774468341851..89e541564ed5 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/stat.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/stat.c
>> @@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ static void perf_evsel__reset_prev_raw_counts(struct evsel *evsel)
>> evsel->prev_raw_counts->aggr.val = 0;
>> evsel->prev_raw_counts->aggr.ena = 0;
>> evsel->prev_raw_counts->aggr.run = 0;
>> + perf_evsel__reset_raw_counts(evsel);
>
> that seems needed, but we have it scathered all over the place,
> could you centralize the reset? the way I see it the perf_counts__reset
> should zero all the members of struct perf_counts.. so also
> the aggr values
>
> it could also check for counts != NULL and we could call it
> instead of:
> perf_evsel__reset_prev_raw_counts
> perf_evsel__reset_raw_counts
> perf_counts__reset
>
> jirka
>
While sometime, we may want to only reset evsel->counts and sometime we just
want to reset the evsel->prev_raw_counts. So maybe we improve
perf_evsel__reset_counts to:
void perf_evsel__reset_counts(struct evsel *evsel, bool counts, bool
prev_raw_counts)
{
if (counts)
perf_counts__reset(evsel->counts);
if (prev_raw_counts && evsel->prev_raw_counts);
perf_counts__reset(evsel->prev_raw_counts);
}
static void perf_counts__reset(struct perf_counts *counts)
{
counts->aggr.val = 0;
counts->aggr.ena = 0;
counts->aggr.run = 0;
xyarray__reset(counts->loaded);
xyarray__reset(counts->values);
}
So we will only keep perf_evsel__reset_counts and remove
perf_evsel__reset_prev_raw_counts.
Thanks
Jin Yao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-08 2:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-07 6:58 [PATCH v3 0/4] perf stat: Support overall statistics for interval mode Jin Yao
2020-05-07 6:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] perf stat: Fix wrong per-thread runtime stat " Jin Yao
2020-05-07 15:19 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-05-08 2:03 ` Jin, Yao
2020-05-07 6:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] perf counts: Reset prev_raw_counts counts Jin Yao
2020-05-07 15:19 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-05-08 2:45 ` Jin, Yao [this message]
2020-05-07 6:58 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] perf stat: Copy counts from prev_raw_counts to evsel->counts Jin Yao
2020-05-07 15:19 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-05-08 3:34 ` Jin, Yao
2020-05-07 6:58 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] perf stat: Report summary for interval mode Jin Yao
2020-05-07 15:18 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-05-08 1:11 ` Jin, Yao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0d7cbbb0-9c35-c6c8-839b-2f12d6ed2808@linux.intel.com \
--to=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox