From: Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@codeaurora.org>
To: hemantk@codeaurora.org
Cc: manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, bqiang@codeaurora.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, clew@codeaurora.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bbhatt=codeaurora.org@codeaurora.org,
hemantk=codeaurora.org@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: qrtr: mhi: synchronize qrtr and mhi preparation
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 11:07:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0da23f32f4313c0b701bafc078942a4e@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4214f00fa8cbcced4f389125b392f3b3@codeaurora.org>
On 2021-07-21 10:52 AM, hemantk@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2021-07-20 18:42, Bhaumik Bhatt wrote:
>> A dl callback can be received anytime after mhi_prepare_for_transfer
>> has been called. There is a window where the callback may happen
>> before the probe initializes the qrtr_mhi_dev state. Move the
>> mhi_prepare_for_transfer call after the registering the endpoint.
>>
>> Once moved, the reverse can happen where qrtr will try to send a
>> packet
>> before the channels are prepared. Add a wait in the sending path to
>> ensure the channels are prepared before trying to do a ul transfer.
>>
>> Fixes: a2e2cc0dbb11 ("net: qrtr: Start MHI channels during init")
>> Signed-off-by: Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> net/qrtr/mhi.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/qrtr/mhi.c b/net/qrtr/mhi.c
>> index 29b4fa3..22b0395 100644
>> --- a/net/qrtr/mhi.c
>> +++ b/net/qrtr/mhi.c
>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ struct qrtr_mhi_dev {
>> struct qrtr_endpoint ep;
>> struct mhi_device *mhi_dev;
>> struct device *dev;
>> + struct completion ready;
>> };
>>
>> /* From MHI to QRTR */
>> @@ -50,6 +51,10 @@ static int qcom_mhi_qrtr_send(struct qrtr_endpoint
>> *ep, struct sk_buff *skb)
>> struct qrtr_mhi_dev *qdev = container_of(ep, struct qrtr_mhi_dev,
>> ep);
>> int rc;
>>
>> + rc = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&qdev->ready);
>> + if (rc)
>> + goto free_skb;
>> +
>> if (skb->sk)
>> sock_hold(skb->sk);
>>
>> @@ -78,11 +83,6 @@ static int qcom_mhi_qrtr_probe(struct mhi_device
>> *mhi_dev,
>> struct qrtr_mhi_dev *qdev;
>> int rc;
>>
>> - /* start channels */
>> - rc = mhi_prepare_for_transfer(mhi_dev, MHI_CH_INBOUND_ALLOC_BUFS);
>> - if (rc)
>> - return rc;
>> -
>> qdev = devm_kzalloc(&mhi_dev->dev, sizeof(*qdev), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!qdev)
>> return -ENOMEM;
> would it be good to init completion variable here (call
> init_completion) ?
You mean just before setting qdev->mhi_dev? I don't see why that would
make a difference
mainly because the qcom_mhi_qrtr_send() will only happen after endpoint
is
registered and DL xfer cb will also only come in after we have prepared
the
channels and completed ready with dev_data already set.
>> @@ -90,12 +90,22 @@ static int qcom_mhi_qrtr_probe(struct mhi_device
>> *mhi_dev,
>> qdev->mhi_dev = mhi_dev;
>> qdev->dev = &mhi_dev->dev;
>> qdev->ep.xmit = qcom_mhi_qrtr_send;
>> + init_completion(&qdev->ready);
>>
>
>>
>> return 0;
Thanks,
Bhaumik
---
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-21 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-21 1:42 [PATCH] net: qrtr: mhi: synchronize qrtr and mhi preparation Bhaumik Bhatt
2021-07-21 17:52 ` hemantk
2021-07-21 18:07 ` Bhaumik Bhatt [this message]
2021-07-21 22:27 ` hemantk
2021-07-22 19:04 ` Bhaumik Bhatt
2021-07-22 19:50 ` Bhaumik Bhatt
2021-07-23 2:45 ` hemantk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-11-05 1:29 Chris Lew
2024-11-06 9:14 ` Maxim Kochetkov
2024-11-07 11:27 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-11-07 19:58 ` Chris Lew
2024-11-08 10:32 ` Johan Hovold
2024-11-22 0:28 ` Chris Lew
2024-11-24 15:04 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-11-25 19:05 ` Chris Lew
2025-03-18 8:03 ` Johan Hovold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0da23f32f4313c0b701bafc078942a4e@codeaurora.org \
--to=bbhatt@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bbhatt=codeaurora.org@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bqiang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=clew@codeaurora.org \
--cc=hemantk=codeaurora.org@codeaurora.org \
--cc=hemantk@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox