Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 06/17] soundwire: cadence_master: use firmware defaults for frame shape

Cezary Rojewski
2019-08-06T16:15:11Z

On 2019-08-06 17:36, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
>
> On 8/6/19 10:27 AM, Cezary Rojewski wrote:
>> On 2019-08-06 02:55, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.c
>>> b/drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.c
>>> index 5d9729b4d634..89c55e4bb72c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.c
>>> @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@
>>>   #define CDNS_MCP_SSPSTAT            0xC
>>>   #define CDNS_MCP_FRAME_SHAPE            0x10
>>>   #define CDNS_MCP_FRAME_SHAPE_INIT        0x14
>>> +#define CDNS_MCP_FRAME_SHAPE_COL_MASK        GENMASK(2, 0)
>>> +#define CDNS_MCP_FRAME_SHAPE_ROW_OFFSET        3
>>>   #define CDNS_MCP_CONFIG_UPDATE            0x18
>>>   #define CDNS_MCP_CONFIG_UPDATE_BIT        BIT(0)
>>> @@ -175,7 +177,6 @@
>>>   /* Driver defaults */
>>>   #define CDNS_DEFAULT_CLK_DIVIDER        0
>>> -#define CDNS_DEFAULT_FRAME_SHAPE        0x30
>>>   #define CDNS_DEFAULT_SSP_INTERVAL        0x18
>>>   #define CDNS_TX_TIMEOUT                2000
>>> @@ -901,6 +902,20 @@ int sdw_cdns_pdi_init(struct sdw_cdns *cdns,
>>>   }
>>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(sdw_cdns_pdi_init);
>>> +static u32 cdns_set_initial_frame_shape(int n_rows, int n_cols)
>>> +{
>>> +    u32 val;
>>> +    int c;
>>> +    int r;
>>> +
>>> +    r = sdw_find_row_index(n_rows);
>>> +    c = sdw_find_col_index(n_cols) & CDNS_MCP_FRAME_SHAPE_COL_MASK;
>>> +
>>> +    val = (r << CDNS_MCP_FRAME_SHAPE_ROW_OFFSET) | c;
>>> +
>>> +    return val;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>
>> Guess this have been said already, but this function could be
>> simplified - unless you really want to keep explicit variable
>> declaration. Both "c" and "r" declarations could be merged into single
>> line while "val" is not needed at all.
>>
>> One more thing - is AND bitwise op really needed for cols explicitly?
>> We know all col values upfront - these are static and declared in
>> global table nearby. Static declaration takes care of "initial
>> range-check". Is another one necessary?
>>
>> Moreover, this is a _get_ and certainly not a _set_ type of function.
>> I'd even consider renaming it to: "cdns_get_frame_shape" as this is
>> neither a _set_ nor an explicit initial frame shape setter.
>>
>> It might be even helpful to split two usages:
>>
>> #define sdw_frame_shape(col_idx, row_idx) \
>>      ((row_idx << CDNS_MCP_FRAME_SHAPE_ROW_OFFSET) | col_idx)
>>
>> u32 cdns_get_frame_shape(u16 rows, u16 cols)
>> {
>>      u16 c, r;
>>
>>      r = sdw_find_row_index(rows);
>>      c = sdw_find_col_index(cols);
>>
>>      return sdw_frame_shape(c, r);
>> }
>>
>> The above may even be simplified into one-liner.
>
> This is a function used once on startup, there is no real need to
> simplify further. The separate variables help add debug traces as needed
> and keep the code readable while showing how the values are encoded into
> a register.

Eh, I've thought it's gonna be exposed to userspace (via uapi) so it can
be fetched by tests or tools.

In such case - if there is a single usage only - guess function is fine
as is.