From: Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev>
To: Joel Granados <j.granados@samsung.com>
Cc: "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: simplify the min/max boundary check
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 21:13:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0eed407a-bcbd-4edf-83b7-7c6fd992c1ce@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240731071904.xiydz3icjslwaxzl@joelS2.panther.com>
On 2024/7/31 15:19, Joel Granados wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:02:23PM +0800, Wen Yang wrote:
>> The do_proc_dointvec_minmax_conv_param structure provides the minimum and
>> maximum values for doing range checking for the proc_dointvec_minmax()
>> handler, while the do_proc_douintvec_minmax_conv_param structure also
>> provides the minimum and maximum values for doing range checking for the
>> proc_douintvec_minmax()/proc_dou8vec_minmax() handlers.
>>
>> To avoid duplicate code, a new do_proc_minmax_conv_param structure has been
>> introduced to replace both do_proc_dointvec_minmax_conv_param and
>> do_proc_douintvec_minmax_conv_param mentioned above.
>>
>> This also prepares for the removal of sysctl_vals and sysctl_long_vals.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev>
>> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>> Cc: Joel Granados <j.granados@samsung.com>
>> Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
>> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>> kernel/sysctl.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> This does not cleanly apply to current 6.11-rc1. Please send a v3 that
> applies to current release. Thx
Thanks. I will do the change and send v3 soon.
--
Best wishes,
Wen
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-01 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20240715150300eucas1p2c7b7124555f53da23db4e47636c3300d@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2024-07-15 15:02 ` [PATCH v2] sysctl: simplify the min/max boundary check Wen Yang
2024-07-31 7:19 ` Joel Granados
2024-08-01 13:13 ` Wen Yang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0eed407a-bcbd-4edf-83b7-7c6fd992c1ce@linux.dev \
--to=wen.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=j.granados@samsung.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox