RE: [PATCH v3 3/3] clk: samsung: exynos990: Fix PERIS gate clock parents

["Alim Akhtar" <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org>
> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2026 6:02 PM
> To: Denzeel Oliva <wachiturroxd150@gmail.com>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>; Sylwester Nawrocki
> <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>; Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>;
> Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>; Michael Turquette
> <mturquette@baylibre.com>; Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>; Brian
> Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>; Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>; Conor
> Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> clk@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] clk: samsung: exynos990: Fix PERIS gate clock
> parents
> 
> Hi Krysztof & Denzeel,
> 
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 at 13:36, Denzeel Oliva <wachiturroxd150@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Correct eight PERIS gate clock parents to match the hardware clock
> > tree and reorder the GIC mux parents so mout_peris_bus_user is the
> > default source.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Denzeel Oliva <wachiturroxd150@gmail.com>
> > ---
> 
> Reviewed-by: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org>
> 
> @Krysztof: I was thinking, maybe we should establish a new rule/best
> practice for Samsung clock upstream submissions whereby patch
> contributors should link to the downstream cal-if code for the SoC after the --
> - line. That would make reviewing the patches' correctness a bit easier, as the
> downstream cal-if code would be readily available to the reviewer.
> 
We can leave this choice to the reviewer if they want to refer to downstream cal-if code.

Regards
Alim

> regards,
> 
> Peter
>