From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934013AbaEFE7K (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2014 00:59:10 -0400 Received: from mailout3.samsung.com ([203.254.224.33]:13691 "EHLO mailout3.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750987AbaEFE7H (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2014 00:59:07 -0400 X-AuditID: cbfee690-b7fcd6d0000026e0-a9-53686c190344 From: Kukjin Kim To: "'Alexandre Courbot'" , "'Jingoo Han'" , "'Ben Dooks'" , "'Thierry Reding'" Cc: "'Alexandre Courbot'" , "'Bryan Wu'" , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, "'Linux Kernel Mailing List'" References: <1393480414-19473-1-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <1393480414-19473-2-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <000701cf54a2$7c1379c0$743a6d40$%han@samsung.com> In-reply-to: Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: SAMSUNG: remove gpio flags in dev-backlight Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 13:59:05 +0900 Message-id: <0fa001cf68e7$e7c4c440$b74e4cc0$@samsung.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-index: AQIdvoULnfVj2yfw4NbVIN1da9gVQQJHdzxCApSx5cgB1HITugJQGPi7Akwv5zGaO+tPcA== Content-language: ko X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrAIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t8zA13JnIxgg2VnLC2+PzzFajFp3QEm i6M7JzJZnHv1iMXi8sJLrBab5/9htLi8aw6bxd27qxgtfu6ax+LA6fF31Qtmj52z7rJ79Da/ Y/Po27KK0ePzJrkA1igum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujGlX9rMX3OGquL9nF1sD42aOLkZODgkBE4nz P8+wQNhiEhfurWfrYuTiEBJYxiix/eZ6ZpiiC329jBCJRYwSR/e/gqr6yyjRfqIfrIpNQEPi 8Ptn7CAJEYEFjBJXf35iBXGYBY4ySryf2MMC0dLGLHH15A82kBZOgWCJO923WEFsYQFPiZ2b v4HFWQRUJZb/XAJm8wpYSmz6c4AJwhaU+DH5Hti1zALqEpPmLWKGsOUlNq95C3WsgsSOs68Z QWwRgQiJLZc3Q9WLSOx78Q7sCQmBRg6J5ct+QC0TkPg2+RBQEQdQQlZi0wGoOZISB1fcYJnA KDELyepZSFbPQrJ6FpIVCxhZVjGKphYkFxQnpReZ6BUn5haX5qXrJefnbmKExPaEHYz3Dlgf YkwGWj+RWUo0OR+YGvJK4g2NzYwsTE1MjY3MLc1IE1YS51V7lBQkJJCeWJKanZpakFoUX1Sa k1p8iJGJg1OqgbHyn4aKj9lyoe8CD9c3y0dVRG2fqeMgMuE57yndsHdNCtJKQUaKf3lVl1UL y/y66r0y6FtNUfT5tLcrxS5PS+5ufiny9jP3laeMVWdV1r1R3C6nqvlahN9o7vNL286IHP3H 3jZ1T5d3aJPXloAXV9sv7lrM63Wl7bJyh8p3R/0rm64vDha8+V2JpTgj0VCLuag4EQDSmybM AwMAAA== X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrLKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t9jAV3JnIxgg+mvTSy+PzzFajFp3QEm i6M7JzJZnHv1iMXi8sJLrBab5/9htLi8aw6bxd27qxgtfu6ax+LA6fF31Qtmj52z7rJ79Da/ Y/Po27KK0ePzJrkA1qgGRpuM1MSU1CKF1Lzk/JTMvHRbJe/geOd4UzMDQ11DSwtzJYW8xNxU WyUXnwBdt8wcoIuUFMoSc0qBQgGJxcVK+naYJoSGuOlawDRG6PqGBMH1GBmggYR1jBnTruxn L7jDVXF/zy62BsbNHF2MnBwSAiYSF/p6GSFsMYkL99azdTFycQgJLGKUOLr/FZTzl1Gi/UQ/ M0gVm4CGxOH3z9hBEiICCxglrv78xAriMAscZZR4P7GHBaKljVni6skfbCAtnALBEne6b7GC 2MICnhI7N38Di7MIqEos/7kEzOYVsJTY9OcAE4QtKPFj8j0WEJtZQF1i0rxFzBC2vMTmNW+Z IY5VkNhx9jXY4SICERJbLm+GqheR2PfiHeMERqFZSEbNQjJqFpJRs5C0LGBkWcUomlqQXFCc lJ5rqFecmFtcmpeul5yfu4kRnDieSe1gXNlgcYhRgINRiYf3xMr0YCHWxLLiytxDjBIczEoi vP5OGcFCvCmJlVWpRfnxRaU5qcWHGJOBPp3ILCWanA9Mankl8YbGJmZGlkZmFkYm5uakCSuJ 8x5otQ4UEkhPLEnNTk0tSC2C2cLEwSnVwJiw5uf90Av1rApremyXcLHIuByXcLzB//Z5XaRa CtuLou8fz7BM3HjmrI7wkps3NCZu0rE09dN5uY0/KURwQjyX+kWR+lf/fnzaLSK96/bX7YGs 7j47qk1mqf278+PFq7fLnZ5sviV64Mz+2hy20n891R5r3lrIHtVx+HpIOnKCapfz52UrFXiV WIozEg21mIuKEwEwc7YvYAMAAA== DLP-Filter: Pass X-MTR: 20000000000000000@CPGS X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alexandre Courbot wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Alexandre Courbot > wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Jingoo Han wrote: > >> On Thursday, April 10, 2014 1:17 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > >>> > >>> Ping, can I have the Samsung folks review and ,aybe even merge this > >>> patch? enable_gpio_flags is never used in any code, is replaced by > >>> gpiod, and we would like to remove it altogether from pwm_bl. Thanks! > >> > >> OK, I see. It looks good. > >> > >> As far as I know, 'enable_gpio_flags' has not been being used > >> for Samsung platform. So, there will be no side effect, > >> if 'enable_gpio_flags' is removed from 'arch/arm/plat-samsung' > >> directory. > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Jingoo Han > > > > Great, thanks. Ben, Kukjin, could we have your Acked-by? > > > > Thierry, if the Samsung maintainers are ok with it, and 2/2 of this > > series is also ok for you (you merged the same for simple-panel > > already), can you take both into your tree? > > Last call - could we have a Acked-by from Ben or Kukjin and merge this > through Thierry's tree? Otherwise I will just have to drop this > series, which would be sad. Very sorry for late response. I missed... :( Looks good to me, so please go ahead with my ack. Thanks, Kukjin