From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: "Dieter Nützel" <Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>, Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>,
Beau Kuiper <kuib-kl@ljbc.wa.edu.au>,
Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ReiserFS List <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Significant performace improvements on reiserfs systems
Date: 20 Sep 2001 18:24:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1001024694.6048.246.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200109202112.f8KLCXG16849@zero.tech9.net>
In-Reply-To: <20010920170812.CCCACE641B@ns1.suse.com> <3BAA29C2.A9718F49@zip.com.au> <1001019170.6090.134.camel@phantasy> <200109202112.f8KLCXG16849@zero.tech9.net>
On Thu, 2001-09-20 at 17:11, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > I am putting together a conditional scheduling patch to fix some of the
> > worst cases, for use in conjunction with the preemption patch, and this
> > might be useful.
>
> The conditional_schedule() function hampered me from running it already.
hrm, i didnt notice that conditional_schedule wasnt defined in that
patch. you will need to do it, but do something more like
if (current->need_resched && current->lock_depth == 0) {
unlock_kernel();
lock_kernel();
}
like Andrew wrote.
If you don't jump on the idea of trying this :) I will send work out a
patch that does some other low-latency thigns and send it out.
--
Robert M. Love
rml at ufl.edu
rml at tech9.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-20 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20010920170812.CCCACE641B@ns1.suse.com>
2001-09-20 17:19 ` [PATCH] Significant performace improvements on reiserfs systems Chris Mason
2001-09-20 17:39 ` Andrew Morton
2001-09-20 20:52 ` Robert Love
2001-09-20 21:11 ` Dieter Nützel
[not found] ` <200109202112.f8KLCXG16849@zero.tech9.net>
2001-09-20 22:24 ` Robert Love [this message]
2001-09-20 22:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-20 22:56 ` Robert Love
2001-09-20 23:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-20 23:41 ` Robert Love
2001-09-21 0:37 ` george anzinger
2001-09-21 1:20 ` Andrew Morton
2001-09-21 3:14 ` Robert Love
2001-09-21 9:32 ` [reiserfs-list] " Nikita Danilov
2001-09-21 12:18 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-21 12:31 ` Nikita Danilov
2001-09-23 23:49 ` Rusty Russell
2001-09-20 18:47 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-20 18:58 ` Andrew Morton
2001-09-20 19:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli
[not found] <200109201708.f8KH8sG15617@zero.tech9.net>
2001-09-20 20:48 ` Robert Love
2001-09-20 17:08 Dieter Nützel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1001024694.6048.246.camel@phantasy \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=kuib-kl@ljbc.wa.edu.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mason@suse.com \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox