public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Pang <ozone@algorithm.com.au>
To: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, safemode@speakeasy.net,
	Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de, iafilius@xs4all.nl,
	ilsensine@inwind.it, george@mvista.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 13:57:16 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1001131036.557760.4340.nullmailer@bozar.algorithm.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1000939458.3853.17.camel@phantasy>
In-Reply-To: <1000939458.3853.17.camel@phantasy>

On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 06:44:09PM -0400, Robert Love wrote:

> Available at:
> http://tech9.net/rml/linux/patch-rml-2.4.9-ac12-preempt-stats-1 and
> http://tech9.net/rml/linux/patch-rml-2.4.10-pre12-preempt-stats-1
> for 2.4.9-ac12 and 2.4.10-pre12, respectively.

hi Robert, thanks for producing the stats patches!

i did a test of it on linux-2.4.10-pre13 with Benno Senoner's
lowlatency program, which i hacked up a bit to output
/proc/latencytimes after each of the graphs.  test results are at

    http://www.algorithm.com.au/hacking/linux-lowlatency/2.4.10-pre13-pes/

and since i stared at the results in disbelief, i won't even try
to guess what's going on :).  maybe you can make some sense of
it?

i'm prety sure his latencytest program runs at real-time
priority, but i'll run another test just with the getrt and rt
programs just posted to the list to make sure.  that's the only
reason i can think why the graph is so bizarre compared to the
/proc/latencytimes results.


-- 
#ozone/algorithm <ozone@algorithm.com.au>          - trust.in.love.to.save

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-09-22  3:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-09-19 22:44 [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool Robert Love
2001-09-20  1:40 ` Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
2001-09-20  2:23   ` safemode
2001-09-20  1:13     ` David Lang
2001-09-20  2:57       ` Robert Love
2001-09-20  2:38     ` Robert Love
2001-09-20  6:31 ` Dieter Nützel
2001-09-20  6:31 ` Dieter Nützel
2001-09-20 20:27   ` Robert Love
     [not found]     ` <200109202111.f8KLBgG16833@zero.tech9.net>
2001-09-20 22:09       ` [PATCH] Preemption patch 2.4.9-ac12 Robert Love
     [not found] ` <20010920063143.424BD1E41A@Cantor.suse.de>
2001-09-20  6:41   ` [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-20  7:57     ` Dieter Nützel
     [not found]     ` <20010920075751.6CA791E6B2@Cantor.suse.de>
2001-09-20  8:21       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-20 20:13         ` george anzinger
2001-09-20 20:38           ` Randy.Dunlap
2001-09-20 21:10         ` Robert Love
2001-09-20 21:35           ` Dieter Nützel
2001-09-20 22:03             ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-09-20 22:51               ` Dieter Nützel
     [not found]               ` <200109202252.f8KMqLG17327@zero.tech9.net>
2001-09-21  3:17                 ` Robert Love
2001-09-21 15:48                   ` george anzinger
2001-09-22 21:09                     ` Dieter Nützel
2001-09-22 23:40                       ` safemode
2001-09-22 23:46                       ` Dieter Nützel
2001-09-23  0:15                       ` safemode
     [not found]                       ` <200109222340.BAA37547@blipp.internet5.net>
2001-09-23  0:38                         ` Roger Larsson
2001-09-23  1:42                           ` safemode
2001-09-23  3:02                           ` Robert Love
2001-09-23 16:43                             ` Roger Larsson
2001-09-23  0:42                       ` Dieter Nützel
     [not found]                       ` <200109222341.f8MNfnG25152@zero.tech9.net>
2001-09-23  2:50                         ` Robert Love
2001-09-23  3:14                           ` george anzinger
2001-09-23  4:06                             ` Dieter Nützel
     [not found]                       ` <200109222347.f8MNlMG25157@zero.tech9.net>
2001-09-23  2:54                         ` Robert Love
2001-09-27  0:02                           ` [reiserfs-list] " Dieter Nützel
     [not found]                       ` <200109230016.f8N0G6G25222@zero.tech9.net>
2001-09-23  2:58                         ` Robert Love
     [not found]                     ` <200109222120.f8MLKYG24859@zero.tech9.net>
2001-09-23  2:44                       ` Robert Love
     [not found]     ` <200109200757.JAA60995@blipp.internet5.net>
2001-09-20 17:37       ` Roger Larsson
2001-09-20 21:29         ` Robert Love
2001-09-20 21:53           ` Dieter Nützel
     [not found]     ` <200109200758.f8K7wEG13675@zero.tech9.net>
2001-09-20 21:09       ` Robert Love
2001-09-20 20:01 ` Tobias Diedrich
2001-09-20 22:01   ` Robert Love
2001-09-22  3:57 ` Andre Pang [this message]
2001-09-22  6:10   ` Robert Love
2001-09-22  7:22     ` Andre Pang
2001-09-23  3:18       ` george anzinger
2001-09-23  3:21         ` Robert Love
2001-09-23  7:05       ` Robert Love
2001-09-23 12:03         ` Andre Pang
2001-09-23 18:31           ` Robert Love
2001-09-22 12:56     ` ksoftirqd? (Was: Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool) Roger Larsson
2001-09-22 13:14       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-22 20:51         ` Roger Larsson
2001-09-22 21:33           ` Andrea Arcangeli
     [not found] <200109202253.RAA21082@waste.org>
2001-09-20 23:15 ` [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool Oliver Xymoron
2001-09-21  0:42   ` Roger Larsson
2001-09-21  1:03     ` Alan Cox
2001-09-21  1:22       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-21  1:51         ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-21  1:38       ` Roger Larsson
2001-09-21  1:53         ` Roger Larsson
2001-09-21  2:08           ` Roger Larsson
2001-09-21  2:29             ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-21 16:24       ` Jussi Laako
2001-09-21 16:36         ` Alan Cox
2001-09-21 18:46         ` Thomas Sailer
2001-09-22 10:30           ` Jussi Laako
2001-09-21 16:18     ` Stefan Westerfeld
2001-09-21 20:18       ` Dieter Nützel
     [not found]       ` <200109212018.f8LKImG21229@zero.tech9.net>
2001-09-21 21:47         ` Robert Love
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-09  5:23 [PATCH] preemption latency measurement tool Robert Love

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1001131036.557760.4340.nullmailer@bozar.algorithm.com.au \
    --to=ozone@algorithm.com.au \
    --cc=Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de \
    --cc=george@mvista.com \
    --cc=iafilius@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=ilsensine@inwind.it \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    --cc=safemode@speakeasy.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox