From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 23:02:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 23:02:22 -0400 Received: from blount.mail.mindspring.net ([207.69.200.226]:37653 "EHLO blount.mail.mindspring.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 23:02:13 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool From: Robert Love To: Roger Larsson Cc: safemode , Dieter =?ISO-8859-1?Q?N=FCtzel?= , george anzinger , Andrea Arcangeli , linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <200109230042.f8N0gw129012@mailf.telia.com> In-Reply-To: <20010922211919Z272247-760+15646@vger.kernel.org> <200109222340.BAA37547@blipp.internet5.net> <200109230042.f8N0gw129012@mailf.telia.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Evolution-Format: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution/0.13.99+cvs.2001.09.21.20.26 (Preview Release) Date: 22 Sep 2001 23:02:05 -0400 Message-Id: <1001214128.873.26.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2001-09-22 at 20:38, Roger Larsson wrote: > Riels schedule in __alloc_pages probably helps the case with competing > regular processes a lot. Not allowing memory allocators to run their > whole time slot. The result should be a way to prioritize memory allocs > relative your priority. (yield part might be possible/good to remove) When did this go in? I assume its in the 2.4.9-ac series and not 2.4.10? -- Robert M. Love rml at ufl.edu rml at tech9.net