From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] (Updated) Preemptible Kernel
Date: 01 Oct 2001 00:21:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1001910106.888.12.camel@phantasy> (raw)
Updated patches for 2.4.10, 2.4.11-pre1, and 2.4.10-ac1 are at
http://tech9.net/rml/linux
Note that the 2.4.10 patch is updated over previous patches.
It's been awhile, because a lot has changed. Please give this a good
once (and twice) -over. For those of you using preempt-stats, I suggest
not keeping that patch compiled in during regular use and certainly not
during any benchmarking.
What's New:
Most notably, George Anzinger of MontaVista rewrote how we keep track of
whether a task is preempted or not. The "preempt bit" has been moved
from a task's status flag to the preempt_count (per-task_struct)
variable. The resulting code is cleaner and simpler, and as a bonus the
race with ptrace and signals (and any undetected similar problems) has
been fixed, so we don't need explicit fixes.
I also renamed our namespace, cleaning things up, and trying to stick to
a prefix of "preempt." Most important, ctx_sw_on and ctx_sw_off are now
preempt_enable and preempt_disable.
The ChangeLog since the last official release:
20010928
- have spin_lock_prefetch prefetch the preempt_count, too,
since its incremented on each spin_lock
- some more ifdef and namespace cleanups
20010925
- modify our handling of the "preemption bit": move from the
task's status to the preempt_count
- the above removes the risk of race in ptrace and SIGSTOP
signal handling, so we can back out those fixes.
- rearrange our namespace. most notably, ctx_sw_on/off
is now preempt_enable/disable.
- cleanup some defines
20010923
- fix strace race: make ptrace preempt safe
- fix job control race: make SIGSTOP signal preempt
safe
- fix adfs compile bug: add sched.h include to
fs/adfs/map.c
--
Robert M. Love
rml at ufl.edu
rml at tech9.net
next reply other threads:[~2001-10-01 4:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-01 4:21 Robert Love [this message]
2001-10-01 5:34 ` [PATCH] (Updated) Preemptible Kernel Steve Kieu
2001-10-01 5:46 ` Robert Love
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-09-19 0:10 Robert Love
2001-09-19 7:18 ` Robert Love
2001-09-09 22:38 Robert Love
2001-09-06 22:02 Robert Love
2001-09-06 20:39 ` Phillip Susi
2001-09-07 0:58 ` Robert Love
2001-09-07 1:10 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-09-09 4:44 ` Robert Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1001910106.888.12.camel@phantasy \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox