From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
Cc: sct@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext3 0.9.10 for Alan's tree
Date: 02 Oct 2001 01:24:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1002000273.865.13.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BB946B4.C7479C16@zip.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <1001989916.2780.61.camel@phantasy> <3BB946B4.C7479C16@zip.com.au>
On Tue, 2001-10-02 at 00:46, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Yes, sorry. It's turning out to be a lot of work keeping the master
> ext3 tree in sync with two (rather different) kernels, and running around
> after all the changes which are happening in (ahem) one of them.
Don't explain that -- I know :) I think all of us are wanting a
single-tree development kernel about now...
> We prefer to test a lot before releasing, and the one time I skipped
> that step was for 2.4.10, and it was the one which is broken. Sigh.
>
> Rob, I've added this patch to the download site for interested parties
> to use. http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/
Great.
> But for a merge with Alan we do have a few more changes backed up,
> and some more testing must be done. I'll try to prepare 0.9.11
> for -ac this week. I'm inclined to down-tools on Linus kernels
> for a while, wait for things to settle down there.
I'll be happy to test and do anything else I can. Thanks for the reply
and all.
> Thanks!
You are welcome :)
--
Robert M. Love
rml at ufl.edu
rml at tech9.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-02 5:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-02 2:31 ext3 0.9.10 for Alan's tree Robert Love
2001-10-02 4:46 ` Andrew Morton
2001-10-02 5:24 ` Robert Love [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-02 6:06 =?unknown-8bit?B?RnLpZOlyaWMgTC4gVy4=?= Meunier
2001-10-02 6:11 ` Andrew Morton
2001-10-02 7:07 ` David Hollister
2001-10-02 7:28 sayamindu dasgupta
2001-10-02 18:08 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-10-02 18:36 ` John Alvord
2001-10-02 18:45 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1002000273.865.13.camel@phantasy \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox