From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se>
Cc: Christof Efkemann <efkemann@uni-bremen.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Intel 830 support for agpgart
Date: 02 Oct 2001 22:20:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1002075650.1237.2.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011003021658.O7800@khan.acc.umu.se>
In-Reply-To: <20011002033227.6e047544.efkemann@uni-bremen.de> <1001988137.2780.53.camel@phantasy> <20011002151051.488306ee.efkemann@uni-bremen.de> <1002066345.1003.66.camel@phantasy> <20011003021658.O7800@khan.acc.umu.se>
On Tue, 2001-10-02 at 20:16, David Weinehall wrote:
> If the only differences between the different cards are the nr of
> aperture-sizes and the status-register settings, why not have a struct
> which contains all the valid cards, and use a scan-routine?!
I suppose we could, and this is a good idea -- although we'd be
reapproaching the size of the current implementation which would be
theoretically faster, too.
There are only 3 possibilities right now (i830, i840, and everything
else).
Hmm, maybe I will code this nonetheless...
--
Robert M. Love
rml at ufl.edu
rml at tech9.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-03 2:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-02 1:32 [PATCH] Intel 830 support for agpgart Christof Efkemann
2001-10-02 2:02 ` Robert Love
2001-10-02 13:10 ` Christof Efkemann
2001-10-02 23:45 ` Robert Love
2001-10-03 0:16 ` David Weinehall
2001-10-03 2:20 ` Robert Love [this message]
2001-10-03 2:52 ` David Weinehall
2001-10-03 11:55 ` Christof Efkemann
2001-10-06 23:47 ` Paul Mundt
2001-10-07 1:30 ` Wenzhuo Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1002075650.1237.2.camel@phantasy \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=efkemann@uni-bremen.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tao@acc.umu.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox