public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Hood <jdthood@mail.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sysctl interface to bootflags?
Date: 09 Oct 2001 11:50:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1002642610.1103.39.camel@thanatos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0110091731480.31520-100000@Appserv.suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0110091731480.31520-100000@Appserv.suse.de>

Sorry, I didn't read your code very carefully before because
I thought it relied on ACPI.  Now I understand it better.
It doesn't use /dev/nvram, but /dev/mem.

Here's what happens when I run it.

jdthood@thanatos:~/src/sbf$ gcc sbf.c
jdthood@thanatos:~/src/sbf$ su
Password: 
root@thanatos:/home/jdthood/src/sbf# gdb -q ./a.out
(no debugging symbols found)...(gdb) run
Starting program: /mnt/p/home/jdthood/src/sbf/./a.out 
BOOT @ 0x07fd0040
CMOS register:51
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x80489be in outb_p ()

--
Thomas

On Tue, 2001-10-09 at 11:34, Dave Jones wrote:
> On 9 Oct 2001, Thomas Hood wrote:
> 
> > Hi.  I looked at your code and I saw that it depended
> > on ACPI.  Since ACPI doesn't work on my machine, I
> > thought I should look for another solution.  However,
> 
> Huh ? Read the code again.
> Its no more dependant upon ACPI than bootflag.c is.
> The bootflag is pointed at by an ACPI table.
> The code I wrote functions /exactly/ the same on
> a kernel with APM, ACPI or NO power management.
> 
> > Alan now tells me that what I want to do can already
> > be done via /dev/nvram.
> 
> My code _is_ using /dev/nvram !
> 
> regards,
> 
> Dave.
> 
> -- 
> | Dave Jones.        http://www.suse.de/~davej
> | SuSE Labs
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2001-10-09 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-10-09 14:01 sysctl interface to bootflags? Thomas Hood
2001-10-09 14:15 ` Dave Jones
2001-10-09 15:21   ` Thomas Hood
2001-10-09 15:34     ` Dave Jones
2001-10-09 15:50       ` Thomas Hood [this message]
2001-10-09 15:52         ` Dave Jones
2001-10-09 15:56           ` Thomas Hood
2001-10-09 16:53             ` Dave Jones
2001-10-09 14:18 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-09 15:35   ` Thomas Hood
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-09 22:48 Thomas Hood
2001-10-10 14:05 ` Dave Jones
2001-10-09  3:29 Thomas Hood
2001-10-09  2:56 Thomas Hood
2001-10-10  6:46 ` Dave Jones
2001-10-10 12:37   ` Thomas Hood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1002642610.1103.39.camel@thanatos \
    --to=jdthood@mail.com \
    --cc=davej@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox