From: Thomas Hood <jdthood@mail.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sysctl interface to bootflags?
Date: 09 Oct 2001 11:50:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1002642610.1103.39.camel@thanatos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0110091731480.31520-100000@Appserv.suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0110091731480.31520-100000@Appserv.suse.de>
Sorry, I didn't read your code very carefully before because
I thought it relied on ACPI. Now I understand it better.
It doesn't use /dev/nvram, but /dev/mem.
Here's what happens when I run it.
jdthood@thanatos:~/src/sbf$ gcc sbf.c
jdthood@thanatos:~/src/sbf$ su
Password:
root@thanatos:/home/jdthood/src/sbf# gdb -q ./a.out
(no debugging symbols found)...(gdb) run
Starting program: /mnt/p/home/jdthood/src/sbf/./a.out
BOOT @ 0x07fd0040
CMOS register:51
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x80489be in outb_p ()
--
Thomas
On Tue, 2001-10-09 at 11:34, Dave Jones wrote:
> On 9 Oct 2001, Thomas Hood wrote:
>
> > Hi. I looked at your code and I saw that it depended
> > on ACPI. Since ACPI doesn't work on my machine, I
> > thought I should look for another solution. However,
>
> Huh ? Read the code again.
> Its no more dependant upon ACPI than bootflag.c is.
> The bootflag is pointed at by an ACPI table.
> The code I wrote functions /exactly/ the same on
> a kernel with APM, ACPI or NO power management.
>
> > Alan now tells me that what I want to do can already
> > be done via /dev/nvram.
>
> My code _is_ using /dev/nvram !
>
> regards,
>
> Dave.
>
> --
> | Dave Jones. http://www.suse.de/~davej
> | SuSE Labs
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-09 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-09 14:01 sysctl interface to bootflags? Thomas Hood
2001-10-09 14:15 ` Dave Jones
2001-10-09 15:21 ` Thomas Hood
2001-10-09 15:34 ` Dave Jones
2001-10-09 15:50 ` Thomas Hood [this message]
2001-10-09 15:52 ` Dave Jones
2001-10-09 15:56 ` Thomas Hood
2001-10-09 16:53 ` Dave Jones
2001-10-09 14:18 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-09 15:35 ` Thomas Hood
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-09 22:48 Thomas Hood
2001-10-10 14:05 ` Dave Jones
2001-10-09 3:29 Thomas Hood
2001-10-09 2:56 Thomas Hood
2001-10-10 6:46 ` Dave Jones
2001-10-10 12:37 ` Thomas Hood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1002642610.1103.39.camel@thanatos \
--to=jdthood@mail.com \
--cc=davej@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox