From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Timur Tabi <ttabi@interactivesi.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Dual Athlon XP 1800+ on Tyan Thunder K7 or Tiger MP anyone?
Date: 09 Oct 2001 18:12:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1002665547.1543.123.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BC371B2.6010405@interactivesi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20011009211625Z277979-760+22927@vger.kernel.org> <3BC371B2.6010405@interactivesi.com>
On Tue, 2001-10-09 at 17:52, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Dieter Nützel wrote:
>
> > Has anybody some numbers, yet?
>
> I was under the impression that only the Athlon MP CPUs could be used in SMP
> systems, and the fastest one is still 1.2GHz.
It seems that any Athlon (even Durons) work fine in SMP configurations.
(Although I don't recommend this for stability).
Most people using dual Athlons are probably using the higher speed but
cheaper Athlon parts with no problem.
I have heard conflicting reports of what is actually different about the
MP vs non-MP parts, with points ranging from "the MP parts are just
certified" to that MP actually has some different internals. Whatever
the case, I suppose the difference isn't earth-shattering and mostly
marketing (ala Intel).
Robert Love
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-09 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-09 21:16 Dual Athlon XP 1800+ on Tyan Thunder K7 or Tiger MP anyone? Dieter Nützel
2001-10-09 21:52 ` Timur Tabi
2001-10-09 22:06 ` Dan Hollis
2001-10-16 1:46 ` Dr. Kelsey Hudson
2001-10-16 2:22 ` Dan Hollis
2001-10-09 22:12 ` Robert Love [this message]
2001-10-09 20:58 ` David Lang
2001-10-09 22:30 ` Dan Hollis
2001-10-09 22:43 ` Robert Love
2001-10-11 19:14 ` bill davidsen
2001-10-11 19:22 ` nick
2001-10-15 21:30 ` Bill Davidsen
2001-10-15 21:58 ` Dan Hollis
2001-10-11 19:24 ` Jeffrey W. Baker
2001-10-15 21:37 ` Bill Davidsen
2001-10-15 21:57 ` Joel Jaeggli
2001-10-15 22:07 ` Timur Tabi
2001-10-16 18:40 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2001-10-15 22:08 ` John Jasen
2001-10-15 22:20 ` Wilson
2001-10-16 12:23 ` Bill Davidsen
2001-10-11 21:19 ` John J Tobin
2001-10-12 19:32 ` Joel Jaeggli
2001-10-12 19:46 ` Jeff Nguyen
2001-10-12 20:32 ` Jelle Foks
2001-10-09 22:17 ` Charles Cazabon
2001-10-09 22:24 ` Dan Hollis
2001-10-09 21:09 ` David Lang
2001-10-09 22:32 ` Dan Hollis
2001-10-09 22:27 ` German Gomez Garcia
2001-10-09 22:54 ` Robert Love
2001-10-10 14:45 ` Charles Cazabon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-09 22:41 Dieter Nützel
2001-10-09 23:14 Dieter Nützel
2001-10-17 19:38 Thomas Esser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1002665547.1543.123.camel@phantasy \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ttabi@interactivesi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox