public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Compile Filure on 2.4.10-ac10+preempt+smp
Date: 10 Oct 2001 01:15:25 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1002690949.862.233.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011009214655.A26663@mikef-linux.matchmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20011009214655.A26663@mikef-linux.matchmail.com>

On Wed, 2001-10-10 at 00:46, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> Fail    2.4.10-ac10+preempt+smp
> Success 2.4.10-ac10+preempt+up-apic+up-ipapic
> Success 2.4.10-ac10+preempt
> Success 2.4.10-ac10
> 
> Robert, can you do a test compile for smp just in case?

Ahh, yes.  Thank you for spotting this.  include/asm-i386/spinlock.h has
two separate defines for spin_unlock and we only renamed one of them.  I
guess you hit the conditional that used the other define...

The attached patch fixes it.

> Also, I couldn't find any links to old patches on your web site...
> [...]

I only keep around patches to the last official kernel, plus the latest
-pre and -ac I patched.  Since the patch itself is being updated, its a
pain to backport to older kernels.


--- linux-2.4.10-ac10/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h.orig	Mon Oct  8 18:33:10 2001
+++ linux-2.4.10-ac10/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h	Wed Oct 10 01:08:47 2001
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
 		:"=q" (oldval), "=m" (lock->lock) \
 		:"0" (1) : "memory"
 
-static inline void spin_unlock(spinlock_t *lock)
+static inline void _raw_spin_unlock(spinlock_t *lock)
 {
 	char oldval;
 #if SPINLOCK_DEBUG


	Robert Love


  reply	other threads:[~2001-10-10  5:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-10-10  4:46 Compile Filure on 2.4.10-ac10+preempt+smp Mike Fedyk
2001-10-10  5:15 ` Robert Love [this message]
2001-10-10  5:24   ` Mike Fedyk
2001-10-10  5:34     ` Robert Love
2001-10-10  6:00       ` Mike Fedyk
2001-10-10 22:52         ` Mike Fedyk
2001-10-10 23:06           ` Robert Love

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1002690949.862.233.camel@phantasy \
    --to=rml@tech9.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox