From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives?
Date: 08 Nov 2001 12:53:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1005241983.939.39.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0111081700240.1916-100000@mustard.heime.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0111081700240.1916-100000@mustard.heime.net>
On Thu, 2001-11-08 at 11:01, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> Are there any speed difference between hard-linked device drivers and
> their modular counterparts?
On top of what Ingo said, there is also a slightly larger (very slight)
memory footprint due to some of the module code that isn't included in
in-kernel components. For example, the __exit functions aren't needed
if the driver is not a module.
Robert Love
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-08 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-08 16:01 speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives? Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2001-11-08 17:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-11-08 17:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-11-08 23:59 ` Anton Blanchard
2001-11-09 5:11 ` Keith Owens
2001-11-10 3:35 ` Anton Blanchard
2001-11-10 7:26 ` Keith Owens
2001-11-08 17:53 ` Robert Love [this message]
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111081802380.15975-100000@localhost.localdomain.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111081836080.15975-100000@localhost.localdomain.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2001-11-08 23:00 ` Andi Kleen
2001-11-09 0:05 ` Anton Blanchard
2001-11-09 5:45 ` Andi Kleen
2001-11-09 6:04 ` David S. Miller
2001-11-09 6:39 ` Andi Kleen
2001-11-09 6:54 ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-09 7:17 ` David S. Miller
2001-11-09 7:16 ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-09 7:24 ` David S. Miller
2001-11-09 8:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-11-09 7:35 ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-09 7:44 ` David S. Miller
2001-11-09 7:14 ` David S. Miller
2001-11-09 7:16 ` David S. Miller
2001-11-09 12:59 ` Alan Cox
2001-11-09 12:54 ` David S. Miller
2001-11-09 13:15 ` Philip Dodd
2001-11-09 13:26 ` David S. Miller
2001-11-09 20:45 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-09 13:17 ` Andi Kleen
2001-11-09 13:25 ` David S. Miller
2001-11-09 13:39 ` Andi Kleen
2001-11-09 13:41 ` David S. Miller
2001-11-10 5:20 ` Anton Blanchard
2001-11-10 4:56 ` Anton Blanchard
2001-11-10 5:09 ` Andi Kleen
2001-11-10 13:29 ` David S. Miller
2001-11-10 13:44 ` David S. Miller
2001-11-10 13:52 ` David S. Miller
2001-11-09 3:12 ` Rusty Russell
2001-11-09 5:59 ` Andi Kleen
2001-11-09 11:16 ` Helge Hafting
2001-11-12 9:59 ` Rusty Russell
2001-11-12 23:23 ` David S. Miller
2001-11-12 23:14 ` Rusty Russell
2001-11-13 1:30 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-13 1:15 ` David Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1005241983.939.39.camel@phantasy \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roy@karlsbakk.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox