public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Stodden <stodden@in.tum.de>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: pci: dev->driver "runtime" acquisition?
Date: 03 Dec 2001 18:29:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1007400598.6982.2.camel@atbode65> (raw)

hi.

supposing i've got a "hotplug" style pci_driver,
but who's going to gain access to a device _not_ at initialization time,
i.e. not within pci_register_driver(), but rather somehere in a bottom
half. no pci_device_id* at pci_register_driver( ), since i don't
know the signature yet.

how do i request access here?
could anyone comment on the following please:

1. simple, but intrusive somehow:
	dev_probe_lock()
	if ( dev->driver == NULL )
		dev->driver = my_driver;
	dev_probe_unlock()
   is the locking correct?

2. rather use pci_announce_device()?
	my_driver->id_table =
       		somthing_i_just_built_on_the_fly_and_i_know_it_matches;
	pci_announce_device( my_driver, dev );
	/* probe() does the rest */

3. patch drivers/pci/pci.c?
	pci_acquire_device( struct pci *dev, struct pci_driver *drv )
	{
		/* fill in 1. */
	}

4. simply rely on the "compat", i.e. just taking over some resource?
   i think that's not why it's been called "compat"

any better ideas? something i'm missing?
besides: policy? -- do i _have_ to pci_register_driver() at during
initialization before considering to actually drive something?

any help appreciated.

regards,
dns
		

-- 
__________________________________________________________________
mailto: stodden@in.tum.de


             reply	other threads:[~2001-12-04  0:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-12-03 17:29 Daniel Stodden [this message]
2001-12-04  3:22 ` pci: dev->driver "runtime" acquisition? Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1007400598.6982.2.camel@atbode65 \
    --to=stodden@in.tum.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox